proof that my f2l method isn't crap: F2L solve-15.55 seconds

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's full of people pointing out flaws in your method, and giving reasons why it's bad, followed by your "come back" type attitude. I'm really sick of it as well. Half the stuff you say doesn't even make sense. I think it's ready to be closed.
 
PS ive only been speedcubing for a year


Hey, Feliks and Rowan, how long have you been cubing? For what it's worth, I've been cubing a year and a half.

In addition to the other complaints (double/triple posting, prompting others to post etc) please use quote boxes properly ;)

I've been cubing since may last year, so 1 year and 3 months. After a year of cubing I think I had a sub 14 avg of 12 PB. Current PB is 11.71.
Not that it matters.
Yu Nakajima had been cubing for about a year when he won Worlds, hadn't he?

April 08. Current pb is 10.62 avg 12 :)
 
This method Sucks

I just think you should stop arguing that your method isn't crap, and believe whatever you want to believe, despite the opinions of those who have double, triple, and quadruple the experience you have.
Well, why are you against this method so much. Its meant to be a beginner method, like keyhole, except faster. What he did is he combined petrus, fridrich and roux, and simplify all 3 to create this method. I've been solving the cube for about 3 weeks now, with times of 1:20. It took me almost no time to learn this method, and my times decreased to 60 seconds. It's simple for noobs like me, and I know my times will decrease even more.
 
I just think you should stop arguing that your method isn't crap, and believe whatever you want to believe, despite the opinions of those who have double, triple, and quadruple the experience you have.
Well, why are you against this method so much. Its meant to be a beginner method, like keyhole, except faster. What he did is he combined petrus, fridrich and roux, and simplify all 3 to create this method. I've been solving the cube for about 3 weeks now, with times of 1:20. It took me almost no time to learn this method, and my times decreased to 60 seconds. It's simple for noobs like me, and I know my times will decrease even more.

I'm "against" it so much because it is Petrus except missing 2 steps, and if he just did bad edges and step 4, this method would be at least capable of something a little more than it can in this form. It's merely laziness that makes this method "beginner".

OK guys listen I know this method isn't the best, but every speedcuber has his preferred method. I don't like Fridrich or Petrus, so I use this method. You don't have to if you don't want to, but I will.


MORE PROOF THAT MY F2L METHOD ISN'T CRAP:http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14276

This post contradicts itself horribly. "I know this method isn't the best"

"More proof that it isn't crap"

If it's not the best, meaning there are a ton of better methods, than this method is indeed crap. Thats like saying, "Well I got this bike for 10 dollars, and it's not half as nice as a new bike. I understand that. However, for some reason I don't think it's a piece of crap."
 
I'd bet McNoobums(the TC; inventor of "teh sukc mehtod") created that "RC_Pilot_2011" account. This method is crap. It's not better than Roux, Fridrich, Petrus, ZZ, Heise, or any other good, respected method. Roux takes time to master blockbuilding, but overall, is very efficient. Same for Petrus. Fridrich takes more algorithms to learn, but is very fast. ZZ is popular in Poland(I believe, probably a mistake on my part), and is also efficient. Heise is probably the best method to use when FMCing, not too many moves required. teh sukc mehtod is just horrible. Drop the last hopes of saying your method isn't crap. It is crap. We don't want 15 seconds for F2L/2x2x3 block. We want below 10 to even consider it. This won't help any cubers, with the exception of the few you'll misguide, and make those cubers learn a horrid method. This topic does need to be closed.
 
It's not really that bad. sub 24 with your own method is pretty good, and a beginner picked it up and his time dropped 20 sec. and he was able to pick it up very quickly. SEE! Now it's not the best, it's not good as Fridrich,Roux,Petrus, or Heise, but it's better then keyhole, or beginner method, the 2 methods that really do suck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top