CuBeOrDiE
Veteran
It is possible to solve the cube with few algs but itll be difficult to speedsolve efficiently with such a method...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not owned...heinse is really difficult and requires commutators
hmm....i still think theyll be hard to use for speed
difficult to think up quickly in only a few seconds
I actually read through all 15 pages. and from the useful things, it sounds like your forcing your own method down your throat.
I actually read through all 15 pages. and from the useful things, it sounds like your forcing your own method down your throat.
Down his own?
PS ive only been speedcubing for a year
Hey, Feliks and Rowan, how long have you been cubing? For what it's worth, I've been cubing a year and a half.
In addition to the other complaints (double/triple posting, prompting others to post etc) please use quote boxes properly![]()
I've been cubing since may last year, so 1 year and 3 months. After a year of cubing I think I had a sub 14 avg of 12 PB. Current PB is 11.71.
Not that it matters.
Yu Nakajima had been cubing for about a year when he won Worlds, hadn't he?
I actually read through all 15 pages. and from the useful things, it sounds like your forcing your own method down your throat.
Down his own?
Well, why are you against this method so much. Its meant to be a beginner method, like keyhole, except faster. What he did is he combined petrus, fridrich and roux, and simplify all 3 to create this method. I've been solving the cube for about 3 weeks now, with times of 1:20. It took me almost no time to learn this method, and my times decreased to 60 seconds. It's simple for noobs like me, and I know my times will decrease even more.I just think you should stop arguing that your method isn't crap, and believe whatever you want to believe, despite the opinions of those who have double, triple, and quadruple the experience you have.
Well, why are you against this method so much. Its meant to be a beginner method, like keyhole, except faster. What he did is he combined petrus, fridrich and roux, and simplify all 3 to create this method. I've been solving the cube for about 3 weeks now, with times of 1:20. It took me almost no time to learn this method, and my times decreased to 60 seconds. It's simple for noobs like me, and I know my times will decrease even more.I just think you should stop arguing that your method isn't crap, and believe whatever you want to believe, despite the opinions of those who have double, triple, and quadruple the experience you have.
OK guys listen I know this method isn't the best, but every speedcuber has his preferred method. I don't like Fridrich or Petrus, so I use this method. You don't have to if you don't want to, but I will.
MORE PROOF THAT MY F2L METHOD ISN'T CRAP:http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14276