Petrus or Fridrich?

What Method?


  • Total voters
    60
And I'd like to see you solve the LL in any method without algorithms, and to do it efficiently at the same time.
Really? I thought you would know better.

Care to explain?

Intuitive edges, commutator corners. Efficient in terms of move count and speed. I wonder is Chris would try this using BH.
You can do Sune to correct edges and up to 2 corner 3-cycles and/or up to 1 pure corner flip. Should be at most 4 looks, but should be less most of the time.
Many variations here:
http://www.ryanheise.com/cube/five_edges_and_two_corners.html
Probably a bit slower than OLL-PLL, but it shouldn't take twice the time.
 
I would hardly say that a 4 look last layer is efficient. By efficient I meant something that would be WR worthy, as that is what the thread is about (a method that is WR worthy).

@Sn3kyPandaMan: I don't see where the problem is. I made a claim, and then he made a counter-claim that didn't explain anything, so I asked if he could explain himself.
 
I would hardly say that a 4 look last layer is efficient. By efficient I meant something that would be WR worthy, as that is what the thread is about (a method that is WR worthy).

@Sn3kyPandaMan: I don't see where the problem is. I made a claim, and then he made a counter-claim that didn't explain anything, so I asked if he could explain himself.

If it is FMC WR or 3x3x3 speed single WR, then yes it is efficient, even by your definition. :p
If you mean 3x3x3 speed average WR, then I would agree with you.

Edit:
It is actually 3 look, I included the last slot.
 
Last edited:
@ byu - No offense, but it seems like you "switch" methods every few days. You start with Fridrich, go to ZZ, then make up Yu-Korick, then switch to Petrus, then to Roux, and now back to ZZ. And I bet you probably still use Fridrich for your speedsolves.

Um, you got that wrong.

I started with Petrus, switched to Fridrich, tried out Roux for a few days, helped Stachu create Yu-Korick, used Roux for a few weeks, switched to Roux for a while, then practiced Fridrich a little, then went back to ZZafter being inspired by some sub-16 ZZ solves.

But yeah, I get your point. I just can't choose which method I want to use...
 
Back
Top