# New method to solve the cube..Should i show my discovery to the world?

#### MrRubix3

##### Member
Ok,so one morning i was really bored practicing the fridrich method and so i came up with the idea of creating my own fast method..So i dont know why i was thinking of this 2x2 rubiks cube concept..and so i discovered that a person can solve the cube in 3 easy steps i discovered:
step 1= C.C.C
step 2= F.F2L.[P]
step 3= O/P(LL)
Ok so basically the O/P(LL) is just about orienting and permuting the last layer*(if you're familiar with the fridrich method you'll know what im talking about.)

Now with this C.C.C and F.F2L.[P] steps there is something a little more different.
So, normally when youre using fridrich or any other method that involves the cross into your 1rst step, your worried thinking about where all the pieces should move and about how to execute the cross in a fast way(6 or 7 movements or so)..But..with this method you wont have to think or worry about the cross at all.Now i dont want to give any more info regards this because i really want to ask a question to the people in here before i do it : Should i show this new discovery to the world or should i keep it as a secret weapon?

-Thanks=))

PS.The first time i used my method i solved the cube in 2 minutes,after the second i solved it in 1 minute and know i can solve it within 50 seconds while using it..

Last edited:

lol

#### Tim Major

##### Platinum Member
I think you should show your discovery to the world.

#### Weston

You can keep it to yourself.

#### MrRubix3

##### Member
I know @Rpotts it may sound weird or fake but it is true ;b

#### MaeLSTRoM

##### Member
I think you should post it becuase then people can tell you if it actually will be fast

#### James Ludlow

I think you should post it becuase then people can tell you it actually won't be fast
Fixed.

Seriously though, post it.

I bet Kir has solved it this way already.

^Agreed

#### Cubenovice

##### Forever Slow
Why even bother posting if you are not giving any details?

Troll...

#### Godmil

This thread could be comedy gold.

#### MrRubix3

##### Member
Ok then.. case solved =)).. if you really think this is a kind of joke or..''comedy gold'' (lol) or whatever you would like to call it..fine..then since you thinks is a lie i will keep it..And i feel happy about it =))...oh by the way , thanks to everyone for their answers~ \(^0^)/ Goodluck anyway and bye.

#### MrRubix3

##### Member
I guess thats how you would call Jessica Fridrich when she first discovered her method...''the fridrich clown'' .,am i right?

#### Cubenovice

##### Forever Slow
Blah blah blah...
Why am I not surprised you decide to keep the details of this great new method for yourself?
Blah blah blah...

#### stoic

I've only been on this forum a couple of months and I've already seen 2 threads from people claiming they're going to devise a new speed method in a couple of years or so (without giving any details)...now this :fp

#### Godmil

Yeah, it's really easy to think you've come up with a great new method (particularly if you're not that experienced with the advantages and disadvantages of current methods), but to detail a method and have it survive scrutiny is extremely difficult.

#### Cubenovice

##### Forever Slow
Yeah, it's really easy to think you've come up with a great new method (particularly if you're not that experienced with the advantages and disadvantages of current methods), but to detail a method and have it survive scrutiny is extremely difficult.
True, but announcing a new great method and NOT detailling it is just plain stupid.

#### Cool Frog

##### Member
I think you should keep it and get world record speed.
This method combines OLL/PLL in one step this is going to be hardcore.

#### jack3256

##### Member
Well it could be world beating(probably not) but how will you know whether or not to pursue this without some outer opinions, would be great if you detailed it then we could give you feedback, otherwise it was a stupid idea to even create this thread.

#### whauk

##### Member
movecount for step 1 and 2?

#### dabest2500

##### Member
This method combines OLL/PLL in one step this is going to be hardcore.
I might be wrong here, correct me if I am, but isn't that 1LLL?