yamahammer08
Regular
How is he gonna tell us about it when we've all been dead for hundreds of years?
New method to solve the cube..Should i show my discovery to the world?
- Thread starter MrRubix3
- Start date
How is he gonna tell us about it when we've all been dead for hundreds of years?
ElectricDoodie
Veteran
Hahahaha, Zing!<br></bR>
somerandomkidmike
Veteran
That's okay if you don't. If people have cancer they want to cure, they can find information out easily enough online, at least for a starting point.
OP: Once you can solve under 30 seconds with this method, you SHOULD release it to the public. Maybe it will have advantages to the methods that the majority of people use. However, if you do release it, make sure you have all the details necessary.
MyPianoSucks
Member
I think you should show your discovery to the world 
It might be a new technique to solve the Rubik's Cube. We're needing people that evolve the speed we solve the cube
It might be a new technique to solve the Rubik's Cube. We're needing people that evolve the speed we solve the cube 
collinbxyz
Veteran
Show it. If it's simple (you said 3 steps) it may be a good beginners method? Though not enough info.
Puerto Rico!!!(I'm only a quarter Puerto Rican, but still awesome!)
He got 50 seconds with this? If you look at his videos, he is not that fast (No offence, you're still new, we can expect that) so I think it might be pretty fast?
Puerto Rico!!!(I'm only a quarter Puerto Rican, but still awesome!)
He got 50 seconds with this? If you look at his videos, he is not that fast (No offence, you're still new, we can expect that) so I think it might be pretty fast?
Last edited:
OMGitsSolved
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 620
- Location
- Chesapeake, VA, Antartica
- WCA ID
- 2011LONG01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Lol this is funny.
This Thread Is A FAILURE, I just released this method (QKC) Method litteraly a week ago.
It has a parity that i cant fix though.
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?28829-The-QKC-Method-Tutorial-3x3x3
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?28829-The-QKC-Method-Tutorial-3x3x3
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?28829-The-QKC-Method-Tutorial-3x3x3
It has a parity that i cant fix though.
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?28829-The-QKC-Method-Tutorial-3x3x3
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?28829-The-QKC-Method-Tutorial-3x3x3
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?28829-The-QKC-Method-Tutorial-3x3x3
Last edited:
Ranzha
Friendly, Neighbourhoodly
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2009
- Messages
- 2,551
- Location
- Reno, Nevada, United States
- WCA ID
- 2009HARN01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
The un-PLL parity is M2 U2 M2 U2. xP
anyway, this method is suck. Just like my MOSIE.
Experimenting is fine, but don't label an idea as your own unless you are CERTAIN it is unheard of and moderately fast/useful.
JLarsen
Premium Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 1,880
- Location
- Dover, New Hampshire, USA
- WCA ID
- 2009LARS03
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Oh. I see you went back and bolded your text. Yeah we know, there's a post 4 up from this one making fun of you for it.
Edit: So....it's not a joke? First thread says something like "If you couldn't tell this was a joke there's something wrong with you" and second is all formal?
Last edited:
MaeLSTRoM
Veteran
So you are claiming this method is yours when the OP has given no information about it and is not you?
Nestor
Premium Member
Basically, you take Fridrich and leave cross adjusting to the last step and call it a "new" method.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Deleted member 27249
- Puzzle Theory
