Luke8
Member
That poor judge lol.
Why would it be bad to be the judge of a WR? Front row seating, baby!
That poor judge lol.
he wasn't a cuber, it looked like he had no idea why people were so excited. It was GREAT to be a part of the is comp and super exciting!!!Why would it be bad to be the judge of a WR? Front row seating, baby!
Did you see the judge at the end? Also on fb it's decided the meme is FELIKS IS NUMEBR TWO NOWWhere's the memey quirk in this video? This video is too standard like Mats Valk's WR it's going to be broken quickly.
[B]Step Time STM stps ETM etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total 4.96 49 9.88 52 10.48 [/COLOR]
F2L 3.126 27 8.64 30 9.60
LL 1.834 22 12.00 22 12.00
Cross+1 1.438 13 9.04 14 9.74
OLS 1.334 15 11.24 16 11.99
Where's the memey quirk in this video? This video is too standard like Mats Valk's WR it's going to be broken quickly.
Didn't Lucas do a U3 in his 4.9 and Feliks corrected an error in his latest WR too. It's crazy that records get broken with imperfect solves.Amazing job, Patrick! What's wierd is he did a U, U' U' so the solve could've been even faster! Amazing job!
It's crazy isn't it. Makes me wonder what time would be possible with the "Perfect" solve.Didn't Lucas do a U3 in his 4.9 and Feliks corrected an error in his latest WR too. It's crazy that records get broken with imperfect solves.
It's crazy isn't it. Makes me wonder what time would be possible with the "Perfect" solve.
Depending on how lucky the rest of the solve is I wouldn't be surprised to see a sub-3 eventually.It's crazy isn't it. Makes me wonder what time would be possible with the "Perfect" solve.
A rotation-less, extremely ergonomic 1-look F2L-1 into a LSLL at 10+ TPS. 2.2 seconds? But i don't think we will ever see a truly legit sub-2. ever.Depending on how lucky the rest of the solve is I wouldn't be surprised to see a sub-3 eventually.
How many moves do you save on average with 1LLL? The recog is probably pretty slow so unless the algs are really good PLL prediction during OLL might be faster.From looking at his 4.96, it looks as though if someone were to learn full 1lll and be able to sub1 all the algs then f2l could be forced sub3 making sub4 possible and sub5 average but I think it would require an easy f2l and a sune or ta very simple OLL to form any chance of a sub3 ever. But most of the top cubers probably do 100000 solves a year. Meaning 27 last layer skips per year so I think the UWR will become sub3 this year but it will probably not happen in a competition for a long time.
I think 1lll will eventually be necessary to better world records but not yet.
But I don't think anyone has noticed that if he had his 4.96 solves f2l with his 4.69 solves ll then he would have got sub4 based on @Brest s figures
From looking at his 4.96, it looks as though if someone were to learn full 1lll and be able to sub1 all the algs then f2l could be forced sub3 making sub4 possible and sub5 average but I think it would require an easy f2l and a sune or ta very simple OLL to form any chance of a sub3 ever. But most of the top cubers probably do 100000 solves a year. Meaning 27 last layer skips per year so I think the UWR will become sub3 this year but it will probably not happen in a competition for a long time.
I think 1lll will eventually be necessary to better world records but not yet
Without edge control or other techniques it is pretty much impossible.. You can go for ZBLLs or LSLL stuff, but not pure 1LLL.