• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

One-Answer Software Question Thread

 
We switched to the current notation because OP notation for mega was annoying, long, and inaccurate. Doing R++ D-- R++ D++ R-- etc. is much faster
I'm not sure if I'm right about this but I think the SEE scrambler is random state and the one used for speedsolving weekly is random move. As we all know random state > random move.
 
I'm not sure if I'm right about this but I think the SEE scrambler is random state and the one used for speedsolving weekly is random move. As we all know random state > random move.

Yes, but I'm saying that the scrambler should use mega notation. Having it use Pochmann notation is like doing singmaster for 3-7 but doing a different notation for 2x2
 
Back
Top