My Partial OPLL method

[Rpotts]

there is no way that this is easier than OLL. Nothing to be sorry about, I don't think this is bad, in fact it would very useful for someone who has lightning fast recognition but spending time to recognize the ZBLL case if you only know ~10 cases is a waste of time. Stop apologizing.

wtf why do you want this thread closed, just cause kir was a meany?

 

[Kirjava]

Can you stop apologising? You are clearly not sorry.

 

[Diniz]

- No one will ever ever ever ever use this for ZBLL

Why?

 

[MaeLSTRoM]

Can people please post If they will or will not be using this or thinking of looking into this please. I would like some feedback.

 

[Kirjava]

Why?

The point of ZBLL is to know an alg for every case so you can execute every case quickly. Why bother using crappy algs? Misses the point. Sure, some are fine for ZBLL, but most are not.

 

[JonnyWhoopes]

Can people please post If they will or will not be using this or thinking of looking into this please. I would like some feedback.

I probably will be. I find it interesting because there's no need to learn whole new algorithms, just conjugates.

Kir's being a *****

 

[NaeosPsy]

I probably will be. I find it interesting because there's no need to learn whole new algorithms, just conjugates.

Kir's being a *****

Well, you don't learn 8355 for speedsolving just because it is easier to learn.

 

[JonnyWhoopes]

Well, you don't learn 8355 for speedsolving just because it is easier to learn.

Funny thing is, I did. Then I moved onto a faster, more efficient method. Also, I said I was going to learn it out of interest, not necessarily speed, efficiency, etc.

 

[oll+phase+sync]

A Question rearding OPLL:

If
- All Edges are oriented
- Two Corners are oriented
- One Corner-Edge-Pair (One Corner is already next to its Edge)
- The U-colored Sticker on the corner next to the Corner-Edge-Pair is facing away from the pair (e.g. LFU+ FU is a CE-pair then RUF is a topcolored sticker)

I obviously want only single move setups (F' in the exsample above, so RUF get oriented throug the setup move)


So my question: if all the above requirements are fullfilled, is it than guarantied that an PLL exists to solve this case ?

EDIT:
answering my own question: the 4 conditions above are not enough to force a 1-setup-move OPLL to exist