• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

My Partial OPLL method

I have now fixed this (I think), it is to do with which alogrithms I use, have put a not on the page and made it a bit clearer to sww which is the Perm and which is the setup, hope this helps. Also, thanks dan for making the page!
 
- "OPLL" is an absurd name to use, the terminology we use is malformed enough
- Assuming you were the first to conjugate PLLs to create ZBLL algs is ignorant imo
- This is not a partial method
- No one will ever ever ever ever use this for ZBLL
 
Apology and Explanations

- "OPLL" is an absurd name to use, the terminology we use is malformed enough
- Assuming you were the first to conjugate PLLs to create ZBLL algs is ignorant imo
- This is not a partial method
- No one will ever ever ever ever use this for ZBLL

OPLL as a name is not definite, its just what I call it for my own solves. To put a sensible name on it would be MLSTRMOPLL.

I did not assume I was the first

It is partial because I am still finding new cases as I go along

It was not intended for ZBLL

I posted this as an alternative to the standard LL so that people have a choice. Its just what I use so if you don't agree with it, dont post that, it would be like posting on a petrus method guide thread saying that is stupid.

This is just my method that I wanted to share with other people.
I apologize if you do not find it a good idea or even this that
This is dumb
.

Sorry.
 
OPLL as a name is not definite, its just what I call it for my own solves. To put a sensible name on it would be MLSTRMOPLL.

I literally laughed out loud. Sensible?

I did not assume I was the first

You are listed the proposer of this technique on the wiki.

It is partial because I am still finding new cases as I go along

You don't know what 'partial method' means. Go read the wiki.

It was not intended for ZBLL

I see people calling it 'lazy ZBLL'.

I posted this as an alternative to the standard LL so that people have a choice.

It's not possible to use this as an alternative to the "standard LL" (Whatever the hell that means).

Its just what I use so if you don't agree with it, dont post that

I can post where I want, it's not for you to tell me otherwise.

it would be like posting on a petrus method guide thread saying that is stupid.

Except that the Petrus method is actually good.

This is just my method

Not a method.

that I wanted to share with other people.
I apologize if you do not find it a good idea or even this that .

Sorry.

Why are you apologising? If you were *literally* sorry you'd be acting very differently.

Trying to make yourself look like a victim won't get you any sympathy points.
 
OK. Sorry to all those people who are getting annoyed by my replies.
This is a ZBLL subset but can be learned alongside CFOP.
I looked into this because I am very slow at OLL so I looked for an easier way.
Again, Sorry for pushing this.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top