• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

God's numbers for partial solves

Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
1,754
Likes
11
Location
Sweden
WCA
2010JERN01
YouTube
jernqvist
Thread starter #1
We all know that (by now) that God's number for the entire 3x3x3 is 20. Also God's number is known for LL (16) and tripod finish (15). What about e.g. LS+LL or "2x2x3 finish"? Also does there exist a position with all the edges solved that still requires 20 moves?
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
269
Likes
14
#10
Hm, if there are about 44 million cases for the corners, it should actually be doable to get the optimal quarter and half turn distribution for the entire set... A lot of work, but doable.
Actually very little work. I have a coset solver for this subgroup (and all of its cosets) and it runs very fast; this was the first coset solver I wrote.

There are some results already on the cubelovers list; I'll dig out pointers this evening. The trivial coset was one of the first I ran.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Likes
15
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
cuBerBruce
#12
Building a specific 2x2x3 can require 12 moves. That's the worst case.

For color neutral 2x2x3, the worst case is 11 moves.

EDIT 1: For a specific 2x2x2 block, the worst case is 8 moves. It's also known to be 8 for the color neutral case.

EDIT 2: Building a specific Xcross can require up to 10 moves (face turns). See [post]110398[/post]. I have independently confirmed this.

Building Xcross from the superflip position requires 9 moves, so God's number for the color neutral case is either 9 or 10.

EDIT 3: I see this post ( [post]185213[/post] ) contains all the answers (face turn metric) to all the cases uberCuber asked about.

EDIT 4: God's number for Petrus steps 3-7 is at least 18.

Example: B' R2 B2 R2 U' L2 R' F R' B F2 D2 L2 B2 U F R' U' (18f*)

If anyone cares, God's number for "2x2x3 finish" is 17.
U' R U' F U' B2 U' F2 L2 D B F L2 B U R' U' (17f*)
R2 U B F2 D' U' L' F' L' U2 L2 U2 F' D B' R' U' (17f*)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Likes
15
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
cuBerBruce
#13
I thought I would list a few more God's numbers for partial solves.

ZBLL, without AUF: 15
ZBLL, with AUF: 16
ELL (following CLL), without AUF: 13
ELL (following CLL), with AUF: 14
CLL (following ELL), without AUF: 15
CLL (following ELL), with AUF: 16
LL with a 1x2x2 block formed, without AUF: 14
LL with a 1x2x2 block formed, with AUF: 14

(For LL with a 1x2x2 block formed, the only position where all four AUF cases are 14f* is V-Perm.)

Roux Step 4 (L6E and last 4 centers - 46080 positions): 16
<M, U> group (but solved optimally in terms of face turns, 184320 positions): 16
 
Last edited:

Cubenovice

Forever Slow
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
2,283
Likes
5
Location
Vlaams-Brabant (Belgium)
#16
To check my (in)efficiency at FMC I would like to know God’s number for the following sub steps:
- F2L- slot with no edges oriented, to “leaving 3 corners”
- F2L- slot with two edges oriented, to “leaving 3 corners”
- F2L- slot with all edges oriented, to “leaving 3 corners”

Same for “leaving 5 corners”

To keep things “simple” let’s assume the remaining corners should not be twisted in place.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Likes
15
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
cuBerBruce
#17
To check my (in)efficiency at FMC I would like to know God’s number for the following sub steps:
- F2L- slot with no edges oriented, to “leaving 3 corners”
- F2L- slot with two edges oriented, to “leaving 3 corners”
- F2L- slot with all edges oriented, to “leaving 3 corners”
You need to define what you mean by edge orientation. If a last layer edge is in the slot, do you define that edge to be oriented?
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Likes
15
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
cuBerBruce
#19
If I'm not mistaken LL with a solved pair also requires at most 14 htm.
That's only true if you're only concerned with solving the last layer with respect to itself. An additional AUF move may be required.
Examples:
B' R D B L' B L2 U2 B L' D' R B2 R2 U2 (15f*)
R U R2 F2 D' R2 B L' B' R2 D F' R F' U2 (15f*)
B F' D U' F U F' L D' B' L U' L' F U2 (15f*)
L2 D R F2 R F' D' F2 L D2 R2 B D2 L U' (15f*)
L' U B2 R' B2 R' F R B2 F' R B2 U' L U' (15f*)
R2 D' R U' R' D R' B U B' U' R2 U2 R U' (15f*)
R' U' F' U L' U2 L F2 R2 B' R2 F' R B U' (15f*)

LL with at least 1 oriented CE pair, without AUF: 14
LL with at least 1 oriented CE pair, with AUF: 15
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
880
Likes
0
Location
0, 0
#20
A couple of things I've been interested in:

- Average for a non-matching layer (2x2x2, completely color neutral). For example do R, R', or R2. This versus the average for a matching layer.
- Average for non-matching EG. An example setup is F2RU2RUR'UR.
 
Top