guysensei1
Member
these algs are pretty bad
Most likely generated from cubeexplorer without being filtered for 3 gen.
I wouldn't mind helping to generate some of them.
these algs are pretty bad
Hm. I think this is pretty neat. It's like this:CFCE::ZBLL:CFOP. I respect all the effort put into this. I might give a shot at learning some of these.
Nice. Recognition might be hard though.
For the second case on the google docs,
M' U M U2 M' U M
For the 3rd case:
y r U R' U' M U R U' R'
There are numerous cases in this list that can be done with M (PLL) M' or M' (PLL) M. I'm too lazy to find them all
It would be nice if you could number all the cases, so that it's easier to talk about them.
How many cases are there?
Isn't this just anti-zbll. Which was mentioned in Chris Tran's episode of cubecast.
these algs are pretty bad
...but as hardly any work has been put into that, we thought it was fair to give our names to it.
And how do you know this? Because you've tried?The time it would have taken to make all these algs useable in a solve would have been quite long...
And just how much work has been put into finding decent algorithms in your googledoc?
What is the point of generating algorithms for speedsolving, if you're only going to generate bad algorithms?
Have you tried any of the algorithms out yourself?
If you care at all about algorithm quality, please learn to search for better algorithms and replace all of the bad algorithms.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMLwtnBYw5M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM8CsQhMHHE
http://mzrg.com/rubik/ksolve+/
Oh and don't worry, I don't think anyone will want to claim those algorithms as their own >_>
And how do you know this? Because you've tried?
With all due respect, there is no need for the insolence. If you're going to give feedback, please be polite instead of obnoxious.
Refer to my last post. I said that we would let the community improve the algorithms and we would adjust the google doc accordingly.
Yes, I have tried. It takes a lot of time to check angles and rotations, and potentially create multiple subalgorithms for each one of the already hundreds of algorithms that have been generated.
Josh and I were unaware of this. How significant is the work that has been done on it?
3: R' U' M' U' R U' R' U' R U2 r' U R
4: M U' M' U M' U M' U' M' U' M U M2
6: M2 U M U' M' U' M' U M' U M' U' M
7: M' U M U2 r U R' U M U' R U' R'
11: M U M' U' M' U' M' U M' U M U' M2
27: R' U R U' R' r' F2 r2 U' r' F' R' F2 R2
28: x U' R' U R2 B R2' U R U f R2 (sorry not that great)
29: F' U2 L' U' L U2 L' U' y L' U' L U F R
30: L' U L U2 L U F' L' F L U' L2 U L
43: R' F R U R' U' F' U R2 U R' U' R' F R F'
I did not choose any "easy" cases
I took roughly 35-40 minutes
Hey everyone,
Over the past few months, I've been working with fellow member supercavitation (Josh Bloch) to bring you a LL subset that is similar to ZBLL, with the key difference in instead of requiring edges oriented after F2L's completion to one-look the last layer, it's corners oriented. Josh has generously donated his time to generate the algorithms and diagrams found in the link below for this subset, and all we ask is that you use it well, and don't claim it as your own or any of that other nasty stuff. Feel free to discuss pros and cons, feedback, alternate algs, or anything else about this subset here.
Thanks!
Tom Maguire and Josh Bloch
PS: We understand that a similar subset exists under "COALL", but as hardly any work has been put into that, we thought it was fair to give our names to it.
With all due respect, there is no need for the insolence. If you're going to give feedback, please be polite instead of obnoxious.
Refer to my last post. I said that we would let the community improve the algorithms and we would adjust the google doc accordingly.
Yes, I have tried. It takes a lot of time to check angles and rotations, and potentially create multiple subalgorithms for each one of the already hundreds of algorithms that have been generated.
Hm. I think this is pretty neat. It's like this:CFCE::ZBLL:CFOP. I respect all the effort put into this. I might give a shot at learning some of these.