F2L: (Rapid 2nd-Gen insertion w/ rotation) vs (F/B F2L styles)

Which F2L Method would you use?

  • Quick 2nd Gen -> y' (R' U' R)

    Votes: 29 54.7%
  • Semi Quick 2nd Gen -> y (L' U' L)

    Votes: 17 32.1%
  • Slower F/B move -> F' U' F

    Votes: 7 13.2%

  • Total voters
    53
Status
Not open for further replies.
^ Stop with the word games lol

Okay the topic is solved..
You should rotate instead of using F/B moves to improve look ahead.

[REQUEST LOCK.]
 
I never said the other algorithms don't affect edge orientation :P

Doing only <F,U> doesn't make a case in which all the last layer edges are not oriented.
But it does change edge orientation. Just like all of the algorithms in the poll.

And based on the poll a fully rotationless F2L would be so slow because it kills lookahead I bet.
 
Last edited:
I cant believe it took more than 50 posts before some of the obvious mistakes got called out. Also, begging the question much with those poll options?

I'd do the F ones, that's actually the only F/B trigger I do in F2L, forced myself to it after watching example solves by some fast F2L guys. It's a great help to me for reducing my rotations (which I'm slow at).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top