ECE - New 3x3 Solving Method

[Shiv3r]

So we're stuck with efficiency without ergonomics for the last step. Hmm I wish I could download cube explorer, but I have a Mac

All you need to do is a y' move and then M/M'

 

[theradhaxor]

Also I took a screenshot for the corner permutation both layers algs on a SSC thread, but there a re 10 cases, not 5.

 

[sqAree]

No one wants y moves or S moves in the last alg. ^^
Cube Explorer is really not the best choice as you can either use all different kinds of slice moves or none.

 

[theradhaxor]

What about square one algs for the edges?

 

[crafto22]

What about square one algs for the edges?

Read again there is no step where square-one algs are used for edges

 

[crafto22]

YES.
my algorithms are always subpar and I cant install Acube to let me restrict the movesets so I'm stuck with "allow slice moves" with cube explorer.
for the double H perms though, I like this algorithm:
(x') E2 M2 F2 E2 M2 F2(x<-or do I really need one? the cubes solved anyway.)
the story behind this:
being able to make 2 H's(the pattern/Roux case, not the permutation) opposite each other on the cube predates my ability to solve it. When I generated this case the first time I recognizes it as that and tried to solve 4 H's simultaneously using the same idea, and this is what I got.

My algs are very nice (mostly MUD moves) and I used Cube Explorer. You need to know how to tweak the alg so that the S moves become D/D' or U/U' with cancellations into an M

 

[theradhaxor]

I read the details, but I'm saying that it might be logical to square one algs for edges.

Sorry if I'm sounding a bit rude, it's hard to express emotions online

 

[theradhaxor]

My algs are very nice (mostly MUD moves) and I used Cube Explorer. You need to know how to tweak the alg so that the S moves become D/D' or U/U' with cancellations into an M

So we treat U and D as one move? I understand what t does as I do that my self in solves, but that algs start to get really long, and D moved in solves aren't the most ergonomic if followed my M moves. Maybe, if you perform M' with right ring finder, you could force the cases to mostly have D moves as opposed to D' moves?

 

[shadowslice e]

I vote we call the method ABC or Adam-Briggs Columns. Just because I like the acronym.

 

[Shiv3r]

please no. Briggs-adam. And also, its not really columns first... its kinda a little of everything. please, we need just an inventor name. Im calline it Briggs-adam. It falls off the tongue easier and is easier to say I think.

 

[sqAree]

To be honest I like the idea of "ABC" and at least for me "AB" flows more nicely than "BA" anyway (maybe because I'm not a native spaker?).

 

[Shiv3r]

To be honest I like the idea of "ABC" and at least for me "AB" flows more nicely than "BA" anyway (maybe because I'm not a native spaker?).

not even BA just briggs-adam. BA sounds like crap and its the same amount of syllables.

 

[Shiv3r]

not even BA just briggs-adam. BA sounds like crap and its the same amount of syllables.

but yeah maybe ABC, but Columns first isnt its real name

 

[Teoidus]

Dude, you didn't even make the method... let's just let the creators decide what they want to name it. Let crafto22 weigh in and we'll see what happens

 

[Shiv3r]

fine

 

[crafto22]

I vote we call the method ABC or Adam-Briggs Columns. Just because I like the acronym.

Yes that is perfect. ABC it is

 

[Okboyyyy]

Hello
I really think we you guys have to work on EBPL algs rather than having a naming dispute as that is a reason this method is still considered "experimental"

 

[wir3sandfir3s]

Yes that is perfect. ABC it is

Well, other people may not agree.
Try a straw pole.

 

[Shiv3r]

A

Hello
I really think we you guys have to work on EBPL algs rather than having a naming dispute as that is a reason this method is still considered "experimental"

agreed. Lets just call it ECE for now and be done with it. No dumb acronyms please, just ECE or briggs-adam(like CFOP/Fridrich)
but seriously if you said you used ABC method, who'd take you seriously?

anyway, Ive tried my best on algorithms. Crafto, its your turn.

 

[Renox]

tfw guy who was making name dispute complains about name dispute

Also, I would start using this method because it seems pretty cool but there are no algerinos and I'm not good at generating them