• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Could it be possible for most Cubers to have a high IQ?

What’s your IQ Level?

  • 85-114

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • 114-129

    Votes: 19 27.1%
  • 130 or above

    Votes: 34 48.6%
  • 84 or below.

    Votes: 8 11.4%

  • Total voters
    70
IQ measures a person's reasoning ability.
I would argue that IQ isn't directly correlated in any way to ability to solve a Rubik's Cube, which is obviously just pattern recognition and muscle memory.
I agree with this.

I don’t know much about the measurement of Intelligence Quotient, but I am aware that some people think that IQ is a totally arbitrary measurement of intelligence.

I also don’t approve of the poll - getting people to put their IQ out there, to be taken as an absolute, unchallengeable measurement of their intelligence isn’t a great idea IMO.
 
My official IQ is 118 im dumb lol

I'm a firm believer that IQ scores only measure certain analytical strongsuits, rather than acting as a holistic indicator of overall intelligence. I don't think you should be concerned with any score you get, but if it makes you feel better, scoring 118 puts you more than one full standard deviation above the average score (100 points).

IQ should never be used to quantify one's self-worth, potential for success, or even general intellectual ability. I think it's easy to internalize an IQ score in a community that's highly focused on puzzles and memorization, but it really means nothing.
 
Last edited:
If you can tell when the government, a bank, the media or a pharma company is lying to you, then you have a high IQ. If not, then low IQ.
If you think that we live in a benevolent world, where the above four entities have your best interests in mind, then you have a low IQ.
 
Would it be a viable possibility to say that high IQ people are more likely to get into Rubik's cubes in the first place? Unlike something such as, gardening, let's say, where anyone and everyone can garden, perhaps cubing attracts people on the higher-IQ spectrum.
 
If you can tell when the government, a bank, the media or a pharma company is lying to you, then you have a high IQ. If not, then low IQ.
If you think that we live in a benevolent world, where the above four entities have your best interests in mind, then you have a low IQ.
I like how, given your recent posting history (including your one deleted post in this very thread), it's nearly impossible to tell whether you mean this seriously.

Trust and gullibility are not directly related to intelligence (*); they depend on a combination of possessing a theory of mind and an accurate estimate of how adversarial the other party/parties is/are. Otherwise-intelligent people can be completely lacking on these two fronts, which I guess you could argue makes them less intelligent in a way that isn't measured by typical IQ tests, but then that no longer has anything to do with IQ anymore.

Basically, what I'm trying to say is, lol stop trying to peddle your off-topic conspiracy theories. (this part is an official moderator warning)

(*) There's also a separate debate on whether IQ (as measured by IQ tests?) is a good measure of general intelligence, but that's not what I'm talking about. Intelligence may be too nebulous a concept to meaningfully collapse into a single dimension, anyway.
 
Back
Top