Square-1 BLD Average of 5: 8:59.83
1. 8:59.93 (3,-1) / (0,-5) / (-3,-3) / (-4,1) / (-4,-2) / (0,6) / (6,-2) / (0,2) / (-4,0) / (0,-4) / (4,3) / (2,-3) / (2,6) / (6,6) / (3,4) /
2. (6:50.14) (-2,0) / (5,-1) / (6,0) / (-3,3) / (-2,-5) / (5,-4) / (-3,-3) / (4,1) / (2,3) / (6,-3) / (3,3) / (3,-3) / (-2,-1) / (-2,3) /
3. (9:54.56) (-2,-1) / (3,0) / (2,0) / (0,-5) / (2,6) / (2,-1) / (4,-2) / (-3,4) / (5,0) / (5,-2) / (-4,4) / (6,-4) / (6,-1) / (-4,6) / (0,-4) /
4. 8:48.50 (-5,5) / (0,6) / (3,-3) / (4,-5) / (6,5) / (5,0) / (4,-1) / (-4,-2) / (0,-4) / (-2,2) / (-2,2) / (4,-2) / (2,2) / (4,6) / (6,0)
5. 9:11.05 (1,-4) / (6,-3) / (0,3) / (6,1) / (-1,0) / (4,5) / (3,0) / (-3,-4) / (2,-5) / (6,0) / (-2,-2) / (-1,2) / (6,6) / (2,-5) / (-4,2)
Using qqtimer, captured on video. All 5 successful and sub-10!!!!!
I'll try to get it to Chris Bird so he can upload it sometime in the next few days (since he can do long videos). It's about an hour long, so kind of silly to watch, but at least it will be there for archive purposes. I might put a sped-up version on my YouTube as well, so you can watch that if you don't want to be so bored.
Also, perhaps the bigger accomplishment - I finally know all 90 cases!!!! A few are shaky, like the first one here where I spent about 2 minutes just recalling the case, but I do know them all. With a little time, they should all get solid.
So I can truly say I can solve square-1 BLD without using speedBLD in my technique.
I'm still working on the description of my method - I've made a lot of progress (it's already quite long), but I still have a lot to do on it. Sakarie is providing his website for me to post it, so all I have to do is finish it and it will be there. Hopefully I'll have it up sometime in the next week or so.
Whew - the madness can finally end. Now that that's done, I can finally get back to big cubes BLD. I hope I remember how.
, awesome times.
