A method for 2x2 I made

[Tranman64]

I was bored today so i made a 2x2 method.
First you solve one side
Then you solve another side that is not opposite of the existing side
You can do this mostly using j or t perm
Finally you make a side that is not opposite of either side (again using mostly t/j perm) and the cube will solve itself unless you have a corner twist

 

[ProStar]

I was bored today so i made a 2x2 method.
First you solve one side
Then you solve another side that is not opposite of the existing side
You can do this mostly using j or t perm
Finally you make a side that is not opposite of either side (again using mostly t/j perm) and the cube will solve itself unless you have a corner twist

layers or sides?

 

[Tranman64]

Sides. They will eventually turn into layers themselves

 

[Filipe Teixeira]

That method is not good

Also after first two sides is awful to make the third layer without messing up and hoping to solve the cube

 

[CodingCuber]

isn't that just layer by layer with really long and inefficient oll?

 

[Daxton Brumfield]

isn't that just layer by layer with really long and inefficient oll?

Give this man some credit... There is only so much you can do on 2x2

 

[DerpBoiMoon]

making up a method is better than just you just searching. at least you learnt about the puzzle in doing so

 

[Wish Lin]

Nothing personal here, but since the Rubik’s cube is a block-based structure, face solving based methods are just awful(Ortega as a special exception)

A good example of this is that everyone knows when a noob sees a Rubik‘a cube they want to solve it face by face and everyone know how that ends......