A Full 1LLL pdf

[Eamon]

2 lines pi case is much faster than checkers

what alg do you use?

for 2 lines i use: R U' L' U R' U L U L' U L
for checkers i use: R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U2 R' U2 R

 

[DNF_Cuber]

what alg do you use?

I don't know about @Alex Davison but I use the Niklas-Cancel into lefty antisune
RU'L'UR'ULUL'UL

 

[Eamon]

I don't know about @Alex Davison but I use the Niklas-Cancel into lefty antisune
RU'L'UR'ULUL'UL

i use this alg too, this alg has a lot of gripshifts which is worse than checkers

 

[Deleted member 55877]

what alg do you use?

(L' U R U') (L U' R' U' R U' R')
Mirror of the standard "Niklas-Cancel into lefty antisune."

 

[Eamon]

(L' U R U') (L U' R' U' R U' R')
Basically the mirror of the standard

wow, never thought of that, this alg might reduced the problem a bit

 

[VIBE_ZT]

What's the point of 1LLL smh

Above all, it's sort of a proof of concept.

1-Look Last Layer is the inevitable next step above ZBLL and OLLCP. It's sort of the idea that... well.... Why not?

And if you think about it, an OLL algorithm with a PLL skip is technically a 1LLL algorithm. And... Some of them are extremely easy to recognize and execute.

Think about these two cases:
F R U' R' U' R U R' F'
F R' F' R U R U' R'

They are both very fast, and very easy to recognize. And there are more than a few easy cases like this. So... knowing some 1LLL is nice.

 

[Eamon]

Think about these two cases:
F R U' R' U' R U R' F'
F R' F' R U R U' R'

the second one is faster it doesn't have the regrip in the beginning

 

[Deleted member 55877]

Above all, it's sort of a proof of concept.

1-Look Last Layer is the inevitable next step above ZBLL and OLLCP. It's sort of the idea that... well.... Why not?

And if you think about it, an OLL algorithm with a PLL skip is technically a 1LLL algorithm. And... Some of them are extremely easy to recognize and execute.

Think about these two cases:
F R U' R' U' R U R' F'
F R' F' R U R U' R'

They are both very fast, and very easy to recognize. And there are more than a few easy cases like this. So... knowing some 1LLL is nice.

I agree that I think SOME 1LLL is good. But after ZBLL, focusing on ZBLS should be priority so that you can use ZBLL more

 

[qwr]

This reminds me of a video I can't find at the moment that showed all 3 million plus 2x2 scrambles and solutions.

 

[Eamon]

I agree that I think SOME 1LLL is good. But after ZBLL, focusing on ZBLS should be priority so that you can use ZBLL more

imo, ZB and 1L are both kinda fast, they are about the same speed

 

[VIBE_ZT]

the second one is faster it doesn't have the regrip in the beginning

....yes but both solve different 1lll cases. That's the whole point. If you do the 2nd alg on the first case, you get a T-Perm. And for one extra move and a ***quick*** regrip, you get a solved LL.

 

[Deleted member 55877]

imo, ZB and 1L are both kinda fast, they are about the same speed

ZB has less algs, so it's better overall to learn. But yes I agree that they are about the same speed

 

[Eamon]

....yes but both solve different 1lll cases. That's the whole point. If you do the 2nd alg on the first case, you get a T-Perm. And for one extra move and a ***quick*** regrip, you get a solved LL.

oh, i didn't get the point sry

 

[DNF_Cuber]

the second one is faster it doesn't have the regrip in the beginning

that's funny, the first is the standard alg.

 

[Deleted member 55877]

the second one is faster it doesn't have the regrip in the beginning

The first one (standard) can be executed without a regrip lol. Right thumb push down for F

 

[qwr]

This reminds me of a video I can't find at the moment that showed all 3 million plus 2x2 scrambles and solutions.

Here it is boys: the 1 look 2x2 "tutorial" by @ben1996123 / @Ben Whitmore. I looked through 1 year of chat logs to find it because discord search sucks.

 

[xyzzy]

ZB > 1LLL. If someone who is really good at F2L wants to improve LL and is willing to learn lots of algs, s/he should choose ZB instead. It's fewer algs and pretty much equally as fast as 1LLL.

what is this incredibly stupid take

That's like saying EPLL is better than PLL because it has fewer algs and is even faster. An apples to oranges fruit basket comparison, really.

Wow yikes I misread that, sorry. I thought you meant ZBLL rather than ZB. Point still partially stands; I think it's fair to say that LS + 1LLL has better efficiency than ZBLS + ZBLL, but a compromise approach (cherrypicking the good ZBLS cases, forcing certain 1LLL subsets) would be ideal.

 

[Eamon]

Here it is boys: the 1 look 2x2 "tutorial". I looked through 1 year of chat logs to find it because discord search sucks.

omg, that's alot of work :O

 

[Eamon]

For the other alg sets, like OLLCP, OH OLL/PLL, CMLL, check out this sheet created by teri: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zFnQbFs-YTF0ipi4flYaCJ1vYVXhmcXDqmYnnkF9XP8/edit#gid=0

 

[JakeCanSolve]

that's insane, 3915 algs!!