• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

A Full 1LLL pdf

Eamon

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Messages
126
Location
Lost in the universe
YouTube
Visit Channel
This is a FULL 1LLL alg sheet a friend of mine made(go subscribe to his yt channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbfpdplb0KchARDQKsrpfPA)

1LLL pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10ZsfklRWIvr8sbxiA64wXjGGmau0e9WR/view

Full 1LLL contains 3915 algorithms, all listed above in the pdf, except ZBLL.

Here are some ZBLL recources: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...40FxRNewGnlo8hTHHGQbHP8Mbk/edit#gid=714524521 and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...3-TiF8MQ0RFSS30d5CUK96PoIwk/edit#gid=34031343

This pdf is very high-quality, me friend put in a lot of effort into this. Hope you enjoy!
 

Nir1213

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2020
Messages
1,465
YouTube
Visit Channel
It's not much faster because of the recognition time
it would probably take 1 - 2 seconds, and then around 1.5 - 2 seconds to execute

doing the math for the average, it would be 1.5 + 1.75 = 3.25 seconds, which means it takes 3 seconds to solve ll. It could be even lower, to 2 seconds if your recog and/or execution is faster. You dont have to learn the whole thing though, i would reccomend the ones that are good to execute and not that hard to recognize.
That is pretty fast.
 
D

Deleted member 55877

Guest
it would probably take 1 - 2 seconds, and then around 1.5 - 2 seconds to execute

doing the math for the average, it would be 1.5 + 1.75 = 3.25 seconds, which means it takes 3 seconds to solve ll. It could be even lower, to 2 seconds if your recog and/or execution is faster. You dont have to learn the whole thing though, i would reccomend the ones that are good to execute and not that hard to recognize.
That is pretty fast.
Read my edited reply.
 
D

Deleted member 55877

Guest
And mastering last layer isn't even as important as F2L. Would you rather improve by learning thousands of last layer algs? Or working on F2L lookahead and efficiency?
 
D

Deleted member 55877

Guest
mastering f2l of course. But when you are already really good at f2l, maybe a bit improvement on ll might help. Top solvers know zbll and maybe some pure 1LLL.
ZB > 1LLL. If someone who is really good at F2L wants to improve LL and is willing to learn lots of algs, s/he should choose ZB instead. It's fewer algs and pretty much equally as fast as 1LLL.
 

Nir1213

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2020
Messages
1,465
YouTube
Visit Channel
ZB > 1LLL. If someone who is really good at F2L wants to improve LL and is willing to learn lots of algs, s/he should choose ZB instead. It's fewer algs and pretty much equally as fast as 1LLL.
its all a matter of choice. You dont have to learn full 1LLL, probably the useful cases, and that shouldnt be that much.
 
Top