I can't assess whether my method is easier then yours because I don't know your tutorials (is
www.arnaudensandra.nl your website? I can't reach it

), but in my opionion my solution is easier to learn than other solutions I know. Maybe that's because I found my solution by myself (intuitive, without learning any algs).
I've counted the number of java applets on my website, there are much less than 1 million

There are even less than the number of algorithms you have to learn for OLL when you solve the last layer from a 3x3x3 cube with the Jessica Fridrich method. Furthermore, I would only applet 2d and applet 2f call an algorithm (applet 2f is in fact not easy to learn), the other applets are only examples what you have to do in the shown case, but you don't have to learn them by heart, my goal is that you understand what happens when you make the turns shown in the applets. The only reason I've made so much applets is to explain my method as detailed as possible.
My method is not at all an speedcubing solution (I need about 8 minutes for the 5x5x5, but this has additional reasons: I trained it not as much as other disciplines, like the 3x3x3 Cube or the Master Magic; and my Professor Cube is not as good prepared as the 3x3x3). The solution of Frank Morris (
www.bigcubes.com) seems to be better suitable for speedcubing (he is placed 4th in the official world ranking for the 5x5x5). His method is similar to mine, but in my opinion not much easier to learn than mine.