The goal of this thread is to determine how much support there is for removing 3x3x3 With Feet, and to build a solid list of pros and cons for its potential removal, to take into consideration for the 2015 Regulations.
Questions for everyone:
Do you believe 3x3x3 With Feet should remain an official event? Why or why not?
Yes, it is an event where a special set of skills is needed. It adds another dimension to cubing, just like BLD or FMC. I think we can agree that skill-wize: feet adds much more than something like 7x7 which typically is an event people who solve 6x6 fast, are also good at. (or you can argue it the other way around saying people solving 7x7 mostly are fast at 6x6 as well).
I will add to the pro and con's list below. In short: I think the lack of good pro-removal arguments, makes it a bad candidate to be removed.
Would you support the removal of 3x3x3 With Feet? Why or why not?
That highly depends on which reasons you have for removing. If the main reason is: "I have a feet-phobia" which some people seem to have (not trying to step on anyone's toes here, but if you rather eat worms than solve with feet you seriously seem to have some sort of phobia unless you are Bear Grylls) then this wouldn't make much sense.
If however you would remove it because it is not very popular then I would not be that bothered. However, if that would be the reasoning I would also like to see other events go as well.
Here's a start on a list of pros and cons for removing Feet, mostly based on discussions in other threads.
Note: They are not meant to be interpreted as solid reasons on their own to remove/keep Feet. They are merely pros and cons that would come out of its removal.
Pros for removing Feet:
- Much of the media attention towards Feet is negative and makes competitions look unprofessional. Its removal would reduce the negative media attention and have it more focused on more widely respectable events.
Pleaese provide some backup here, because I don't have this experience. Maybe not many people know this but I also took part in a TV show to solve feet. The attention was merely
positive. Same goes for all media encounters I have had which covered something with feet. Not once have I had a negative comment. The closest to a negative comments I get are things like "ok, that's a bit odd, but very impressive". And to be honest: I think traveling 2000miles to compete in a Rubik's cube competition can also be rightly called "a bit odd" in the first place ;-)
- Feet is arguably the most unsanitary event, since feet are often much less clean than hands. Feet solving (both official solves and practice solves at competitions) can contribute to an unpleasant atmosphere to spectators and non-Feet competitors, so its removal would give a more pleasant experience at competitions.
Again: can you provide some information to back this up, other than: it may smell a bit sweaty. I don't know about you, but I keep my feet in my shoes all day long and they don't touch:
- other people
- other people's cubes
- genitals (yes there are people not washing their hands after going to the loo)
- cell phone screens
- etc
Using this logical thinking: if you have a fear of feet, you must also have a fear of hands.
Also: if you want to avoid the much-feared smell, just organize it as the first event and not after 8 hours of competition...
- Fewer people are willing to judge and/or scramble for Feet relative to other events, and it's not so great to have to force people to do either at a competition. It would also be more pleasant for scramblers and judges for other 3x3x3 events to know that competitors don't use the same cube for other 3x3x3 events right after using it for Feet solves.
I am sorry, but this is a non-argument. At least in Europe the unwritten rules state that you don't have to judge an event you are not competing in. Make 2 groups for feet and there is no problem. I'm sure people competing in feet don't have a problem judging feet as well. If they do then they are a hypocrit and it wouldn't be a problem forcing those people to judge anyway.
- 3x3x3 With Feet did not add much as an event in the first place, compared to other events. As a 3x3x3 variant, all it added was another twist to solving a 3x3x3 using a regular speed method, which One-Handed already did, and did better. Its removal would be a small loss in variety of events
Like I stated above: feet adds more dimension and requires more skill to speedcubing than for example 7x7.
- A common "abuse" of the +2 misalignment penalty is to not perform the last move in a Feet solve if it would take more than 2 seconds. Removing Feet would resolve this problem.
If you really need more than 2 seconds to do a turn with feet, then you are so slow that nobody cares about your times anyway. (if you assume 70 quarter turns per solve, this would mean you are at like 2:20 and would be doing moves without ANY pauses, so realistically speaking much slower than 2:20 since looking around is usually the biggest time waster). If anything this "problem" is not a problem caused by the event, but by the +2 rule.
Adding pro's:
- The lack of popularity in big parts of the community. This is a bit of a chicken-egg thing, because people don't do feet, because they can't do it in comp. But then again: people can't do it in comp, because it is not very popular. Of course everyone is free to organize a competition holding feet as an event themselves, but the way it is, it does not seem the most popular event.
- Rebuilding the stage takes a bit of time. This is not a very strong argument, but I think it should be added for the sake of being thorough. The rebuild does not take much time at all, and the event itself is not slow either, but it is a small factor.
Cons for removing Feet:
- Removing the event would make all Feet solves unofficial. It would take away Feet records that took a lot of effort to accomplish.
- Feet solving is popular and well-liked overall in several countries. This also can result in very positive media appearances that just make cubing look more interesting and fascinating.
- As a removal of an event with no immediate replacement, it's simply a loss of an event.