Ranzha
Friendly, Neighbourhoodly
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2009
- Messages
- 2,551
- Location
- Reno, Nevada, United States
- WCA ID
- 2009HARN01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I don't actively participate in Feet and don't intend to, but have no opinion on its removal.
Disclaimer: I have not witnessed competition in Feet up-close since 2011. At the next competition BASC organises, we want to hold feet.
Some points I've considered that weren't addressed here:
- Feet requires organisers to "set the stage" a little differently, since it is one of only two events to not have a timer+mat on a table. (The other event is FMC.) Naturally, this is what organisers "sign up for" if they want to hold feet, but it can disturb the rhythm/flow of the competition, particularly if there are many solving stations to set up/tear down.
- Unlike Magic and Master Magic, there are no logistical issues which make consistently judging feet impossible. However, writing down scores surfaceless and crouching to check for something like misalignment penalties takes a bit more effort/resource for judges than is usually required. Of course, the argument can be made that holding up a shield during BLD or keeping clocks from falling at the start of inspection requires more effort/resource for judges as well, so the issue of higher-responsibility judging isn't Feet-specific.
Sets of questions I have for anyone to answer:
1. Where do you most frequently attend competitions? How is Feet viewed in your competition community? How frequently do competitions you attend hold feet?
2. If you attend a competition where feet is held, and there is media coverage, does the media choose to record feet solves? What do you think of the exposure cubing gets from the media overall? What impact does media portrayal of solving with feet has on the public view of cubing, if applicable?
3. Besides those who have participated in feet, who is affected if feet were to be removed?
4. What sort of respect do you think feet deserves as an event currently?
Disclaimer: I have not witnessed competition in Feet up-close since 2011. At the next competition BASC organises, we want to hold feet.
Some points I've considered that weren't addressed here:
- Feet requires organisers to "set the stage" a little differently, since it is one of only two events to not have a timer+mat on a table. (The other event is FMC.) Naturally, this is what organisers "sign up for" if they want to hold feet, but it can disturb the rhythm/flow of the competition, particularly if there are many solving stations to set up/tear down.
- Unlike Magic and Master Magic, there are no logistical issues which make consistently judging feet impossible. However, writing down scores surfaceless and crouching to check for something like misalignment penalties takes a bit more effort/resource for judges than is usually required. Of course, the argument can be made that holding up a shield during BLD or keeping clocks from falling at the start of inspection requires more effort/resource for judges as well, so the issue of higher-responsibility judging isn't Feet-specific.
Sets of questions I have for anyone to answer:
1. Where do you most frequently attend competitions? How is Feet viewed in your competition community? How frequently do competitions you attend hold feet?
2. If you attend a competition where feet is held, and there is media coverage, does the media choose to record feet solves? What do you think of the exposure cubing gets from the media overall? What impact does media portrayal of solving with feet has on the public view of cubing, if applicable?
3. Besides those who have participated in feet, who is affected if feet were to be removed?
4. What sort of respect do you think feet deserves as an event currently?

