Cubic
Regular
Nice idea. I wold be interested, but my times are SOOOOOO s l o w that I really don't feel like a speed solver!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think a national organisation is definitely a good step towards developing our sport, I like all the features proposed for the website and I think dismissing having a forum and/or shop is a good call especially for the start of things. My only concerns are financial ones.
I think that maintaining a good relationship with seventowns by letting them in on what we do is important, as they can help out an awful lot when it comes to finance and lending equipment etc. Instead of having them fund the uk open and whatever else they do in a typical year, could they fund the UKCA as a whole, and then you could use their finance for a variety of events/competitions over the year?
What other finance could you get? Maybe support from government, sport England, etc. is available and worth pursuing.
I also think that the first rule mentioned is a pretty bold one, what would competitions finances running through the UKCA entail? It kinda feels like red tape to organizing a competition. I think that maybe the rule could be restated to say something along the lines of: if you want help with funding, equipment and getting a WCA delegate (from UKCA & seventowns) for your competition, then you have to run some/all of your finances through the UKCA and allow a compulsory £1 donation per competitor to be taken. I think maybe you could have staircase criteria such as
Allow compulsory donations => UKCA will provide a WCA delegate
Run some of your finances through UKCA => UKCA will lend equipment out
Run all of your finances through UKCA => UKCA will absorb any losses
Inkeeping with that, I think the UKCA should have a team of delegates, maybe 3, so competitions can be held more frequently and ran more smoothly.
Would be cool if we saw more societies too, and then they could be on the map![]()
I think there are loads more cool things something like the UKCA could do too. Things like the depaul UK maths/cubing festival. For example.
Nice idea. I wold be interested, but my times are SOOOOOO s l o w that I really don't feel like a speed solver!
I'm just going to discuss some of these points made. I have been in on some of the discussion about this, so I'm not just speculating.
You are right about it being easier to organize competitions too having finances through UKCA, but I still think it should be optional.
Say for example if my society wanted to organize a small competition (not the uk open) using our own equipment. We would want to use it as a fundraiser and take a small registration fee of £3 or so from maybe 40 competitors, and put it towards the society... I think this kind of activity should be permitted.
it is
You are right about it being easier to organize competitions too having finances through UKCA, but I still think it should be optional. Say for example if my society wanted to organize a small competition (not the uk open) using our own equipment. We would want to use it as a fundraiser and take a small registration fee of £3 or so from maybe 40 competitors, and put it towards the society... I think this kind of activity should be permitted.
Just got the wrong impression from the way the rule was written
You realise you can host a competition without the support of the UKCA..
I think you are focussing too much on the financial side of things. The main aim with the UKCA as mentioned before is a hub of information for the UK cubing community. The financial side of things is just a benefit that comes with all of this. Ideally we would have all competitions held in the UK organised through the website so people can find venues, events, schedules etc. If you wanted to host a competition for the society's benefit without using UKCA finance you could do that with no problem.
what rule?
I think a national organisation is definitely a good step towards developing our sport, I like all the features proposed for the website and I think dismissing having a forum and/or shop is a good call especially for the start of things. My only concerns are financial ones.
I think that maintaining a good relationship with seventowns by letting them in on what we do is important, as they can help out an awful lot when it comes to finance and lending equipment etc. Instead of having them fund the uk open and whatever else they do in a typical year, could they fund the UKCA as a whole, and then you could use their finance for a variety of events/competitions over the year? We will certainly be maintaining a good relationship with Seventowns. Due to reasons I will not go into, they will only fund the UK Open. We want to carry on like we are, but also ensure that UK cubing doesn't crash and burn should that relationship be severed at any point (I'm sure you've all seen reasons why that could happen)
What other finance could you get? Maybe support from government, sport England, etc. is available and worth pursuing. Sure I'll have a think but I doubt large bodies like that would have much interest
I also think that the first rule mentioned is a pretty bold one, what would competitions finances running through the UKCA entail? It kinda feels like red tape to organizing a competition. I think that maybe the rule could be restated to say something along the lines of: if you want help with funding, equipment and getting a WCA delegate (from UKCA & seventowns) for your competition, then you have to run some/all of your finances through the UKCA and allow a compulsory £1 donation per competitor to be taken. I think maybe you could have staircase criteria such as
Allow compulsory donations => UKCA will provide a WCA delegate I don't see my delegating duties as being linked to the UKCA in any way and it should stay that way. I will go and delegate whenever I am wanted as long as it is logistically feasible
Run some of your finances through UKCA => UKCA will lend equipment out UKCA doesn't own much equipment at all so this doesn't come into play in the short/medium term
Run all of your finances through UKCA => UKCA will absorb any losses Bad idea. The organiser has no motivation to balance the finances and the UKCA would leave itself vulnerable. Hopefully the UKCA can be a place where you can receive financial reassurance but an incentive must be offered to ensure that organisers are trying not to lose money e.g. Projected finances must be approved by the UKCA and then half of all profits/losses are absorped by UKCA
Inkeeping with that, I think the UKCA should have a team of delegates, maybe 3, so competitions can be held more frequently and ran more smoothly. There will only be as many delegates as are needed. I'm nowhere near my absorption point yet considering we've got 3 UK comps this year so I doubt the WCA would listen.
Would be cool if we saw more societies too, and then they could be on the map
I think there are loads more cool things something like the UKCA could do too. Things like the depaul UK maths/cubing festival. For example.
Who will be managing and updating the website with competition information and such? Will it be automated or manual?