I think you're underestimating how bad his ES was. He feels confident that sub6 is possible with a bit of practice.
Not that I'm disbelieving, I'm just trying to understand what this would take as a feat of crazy awesomeness.
I wanted to make an estimation of how fast each step would be in order to achieve sub-6 5x5x5 BLD. I am estimating that cube memorization follows a power function distribution y=a*x^b where x is the size of the cube, and y is the memorization time in seconds. I have seen some other estimates about big cube solving where people suggest it follows a power distribution, so for the purposes of this rough estimation I will follow the same trend. Of course this introduces a huge potential for error in my estimation if this is incorrect. Again, treat this as a first stab at finding an estimate for Ville's break downs.
I know that at his best Ville can memorize the 3x3x3 in around 9 seconds. Again this is an estimation, and in actuality is probably actually even faster than this. Also I have heard that Ville can memorize the 4x4x4 in 45 seconds, so I used these data points to fit the power model.
Using these two points, and fitting a power model to it, I got:
y = 0.0193 * x^5.5945
Where x is the size of the cube (x=3 for 3x3x3, x=4 for 4x4x4) and y is the time taken to memorize the cube in seconds.
So I estimate that Ville could memorize the 5x5x5 cube in:
y = 0.0193 * 5^5.5945 = 157.14 = 2 minutes 37 seconds, or about 2:30 on a good run.
Assuming a sub-6 solve, this would mean a solving time of about 3:20 ish. Using BH it takes on average 369 turns to solve a 5x5x5 cube, and I would argue that this is pretty near move optimal for a big cube to do so for most BLD methods. So for Daniel and I to match this solving speed we would need to not only memo at Ville speed, but solve turning at a sustained 2.35 turns per second. I currently average about 1 turn per second sustained factoring in recall delays.
Ville, if sub-6 is truly possible you are not only my hero and my idol, but you are truly a BLD deity.
--edit--
This power function model is not a good fit for the simple reason that it predicts 0.93 second to memorize a 2x2x2. I'm sure a speed BLD memo might take about 1-2 seconds on some lucky solves, but this is meant to calculate an average memorization time. I'll try to look into this a bit more to see if any data or results already exist from the memory sports community.
--edit#2--
After talking with Mike I think a power function model might not be the best idea, and I also think that my power model is flawed for a couple of reasons. I'm interested to look into this still, and hopefully something neat will turn up.
Chris