• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Help Thread] Petrus Discussion and Help thread

Is the EO step worth it? It takes upwards of 6 moves and great restricts you. I feel like it would be less moves to just do 2L OLL, and easier.
 
It does give you the RU two gen advantage, which can be executed much quicker than CFOP 3 gen pairing, gives you easier OLL, opens opportunity for ZBLL and also, you can influence it in 2x2x3 stage if you’re good. Though it make take some moves, it never seems to affect me, and I can do EO blindingly fast.
 
I want to get faster by learning Petrus. Can anyone suggest a good website or tutorial?

Here's a thread from one of the fastest Petrus solver.


Here's how to solve using Petrus :
 
Last edited:
It's cool to see all the interest in Petrus lately. It's a very elegant method, and good for beginners. Lars's tutorial makes a good middle ground between speed optimization and ease of learning - especially as to the 3 look last layer (permute corners, orient corners, permute edges). I'm tempted to jump on the bandwagon and do some Petrus solves.
 
Have any of you started with Petrus, learning COLL/EPLL rather than transitioning from CFOP using OLL/PLL? Just curious.
 
Back
Top