World Record predictions in the year 2020?

I guess I'll bandwagon. I'm putting names on these, but I think a lot of them will be held by someone who isn't even cubing right now.
2x2: 0.36 (Basil Herold)/1.04 (Nicolas Sanchez)
3x3: 3.67 (Feliks Zemdegs)/5.66 (Feliks Zemdegs)
4x4: 17.38 (Feliks Zemdegs)/23.95 (Max Park)
5x5: 37.80 (Feliks Zemdegs)/45.61 (Feliks Zemdegs)
6x6: 1:20.61 (Feliks Zemdegs)/1:29.98 (Kevin Hays)
7x7: 2:09.63 (Feliks Zemdegs)/2:18.00 (Feliks Zemdegs)
Mega: 28.74 (Yu Da-Hyun)/29.53 (Juan Pablo Huanqui)
Pyra: 0.95 (Daniel Wannamaker)/1.66 (Livia Kleiner)
Skewb: 0.99 (Michał Rzewuski)/2.10 (Jonatan Kłosko)
Squan: 4.20 (me)/7.88 (Sophie Chan)
Clock: 3.00 (Evan Liu)/4.01 (Wojciech Knott)
OH: 5.20 (Feliks Zemdegs)/8.81 (Antione Cantin)
Feet: 16.77 (Jakub Kipa)/24.33 (Jakub Kipa)
FMC: 17 (Kit Clement)/21.00 (Walker Welch)
3BLD: 15.90 (Marcin Kowalczyk)/19.99 (Gianfranco Huanqui)
4BLD: 1:29.40 (Roman Strakhov)
5BLD: 3:54.33 (Roman Strakhov)
MBLD: 57/58 in 1:00:00 (Shivam Bansal)

- Nicolas Sanchez and Chris Tran will work together to create a 2x2 algset known as EGLS (pronounced "eggles") which has you make a face minus one piece and solve the rest in one alg, allowing Nicolas to get a 1.04 official avg
- Feliks still won't react to any of his WRs
- LoLivia will lose her voice before the competition at which she sets Pyra WR, sparing us all
- I will get a 4.20 squan WR single, consisting of a 6 move cubeshape into adj/adj EP, which will be the reason that the squan mininum move count becomes more strict. I will smonk the biggest of weeds after the slove.
- Daniel Wannamaker will get Pyra WR single, then act like it was a terrible solve.
- Shivam's time will run out on his last cube, 2 moves away from being solved.

~Squan minimum move count is tightened to 9 slice moves
~Kilominx won't be an event
~Worlds will have 2.5k competitors
~Clock misalignment penalties will be added
~QiYi will release a Clock (it actually already has a prototype) and will have a similar situation to Squan.
~Squan will become the official name for Square-1
~Kilominx won't be an event
~ColorfulPockets' biggest videos (Things non-cubers say, Worst Judge Ever) and MMAP will fade into obscurity
~RedKB will get an official sub7 3x3 single
 
Last edited:
1. Who asked this?

2. How is that on topic?

3. How about saying: "I think...", "in my opinion..", "I hope..." or anything like that instead of saying that it is 100% sure.

4. It's not helping him getting the WR, actually it makes his job harder, he said so.

5. What if he won't? Will you admit that you were wrong? Will you and all the others stop posting this?


Sorry if it sounds rude, I'm kind of new to this forum but every other topic I ran into is about fazrulz1. I'm not saying he is bad, he has a potential but please wait until he is getting better OFFICIALLY! He is not the best cuber in the world, not even in 3x3. Wait until he is becoming the best.

You can be happy for others but the meantime respect the other cubers (the actual record holders), please.

Thanks!

Feel free to comment, that is my opinion...

lol, this guy was clearly wrong!
 
2x2 - lol/1.34 (the guy that has WR single, idk how you write his name)
3x3 - 3.87 (Feliks Zemdegs) / 5.46 (Feliks Zemdegs)
4x4 - 19.53 (Feliks Zemdegs) / 22.45 (Max Park)
5x5 - 40.61 (Feliks Zemdegs) / 45.67 (Feliks Zemdegs)
6x6 - 1:23.36 (Kevin Hays) / 1:30.20 (Kevin Hays)
7x7 - 2:10.34 (Feliks Zemdegs) / 2:18.35 (Feliks Zemdegs)
3x3 BLD - 16.29 (Gianfranco Huanqui) / 19.76 (Gianfranco Huanqui)
4x4 BLD - 1:46.54 (Roman Strakhov)
5x5 BLD - 4:20.00 (Roman Strakhov)
3x3 OH - 5.89 (Feliks Zemdegs) / 9.56 (Feliks Zemdegs)
3x3 fewest moves - 17 (Walker Welch) / 23 (Kit Clement)
Megaminx - 31.58 (Juan Pablo Huanqui) / 37.13 (Juan Pablo Huanqui)
Pyraminx - 0.89 (Drew Brads) / 1.91 (Drew Brads)
Square 1 - 4.67 (Brandon Lin) / 8.12 (Brandon Lin)
3x3 multi BLD - 55/55 (Shivam Bansal)

For some general things that aren't records:
-A triple digit number of people will know full ZBLL
-CFOP with a hint of ZB will be the most popular method (aka CFOP will still be on top but more people will learn ZBLL and use a lot of ZBLS)
-Jabari will learn full 1LLL and know over 5k algs
-3x3 hardware won't improve much
-Big cubes hardware will improve a lot
 
its to hard to predict because we wont recognize cubing we wont use the same finger tricks all methods wont use blockbuilding cfop will be like corners first we will have sub 40 solves consistently 1 alg 2x2 will be a thing squan and skewb will fade but the main thing which im excited about is.... CUBING WILL BE LIKE ESPORTS!!!! if you havnt realsied cubing is blowing up so.....
 
its to hard to predict because we wont recognize cubing we wont use the same finger tricks all methods wont use blockbuilding cfop will be like corners first we will have sub 40 solves consistently 1 alg 2x2 will be a thing squan and skewb will fade but the main thing which im excited about is.... CUBING WILL BE LIKE ESPORTS!!!! if you havnt realsied cubing is blowing up so.....
We are talking about 4 years...
 
its to hard to predict because we wont recognize cubing we wont use the same finger tricks all methods wont use blockbuilding cfop will be like corners first we will have sub 40 solves consistently 1 alg 2x2 will be a thing squan and skewb will fade but the main thing which im excited about is.... CUBING WILL BE LIKE ESPORTS!!!! if you havnt realsied cubing is blowing up so.....
excuse me squan is the best event
 
its to hard to predict because we wont recognize cubing we wont use the same finger tricks all methods wont use blockbuilding cfop will be like corners first we will have sub 40 solves consistently 1 alg 2x2 will be a thing squan and skewb will fade but the main thing which im excited about is.... CUBING WILL BE LIKE ESPORTS!!!! if you havnt realsied cubing is blowing up so.....
What do you mean by one alg 2x2? People already know EG and it would be impossible to learn an alg for all 3 million combinations
 
What's the chance that Megaminx catches up with 4x4? There are more faces, but there are 50 pieces to place for megaminx and 56 for 4x4. If you figure that centers have one possible orientation, edges have two, and corners have 3 you end up with the following piece-orientations:

2x2: 24
3x3: 60
4x4: 108
5x5: 156
6x6: 228
7x7: 300
Megaminx: 120

I used 4.9 seconds as the basis, and squared the ratio of the number of orientations, and came up with this quite reasonable-looking estimate (2x2 single is already beaten, so I'll say this is the limit for averages):

2x2: 0.78
3x3: 4.90 (will probably be beaten, but it's my basis)
4x4: 15.87
5x5: 33.12
6x6: 1:10.75
7x7: 2:02.50
Megaminx: 19.6
 
Back
Top