SpeedcuberJH
Member
Haha!My favourite reaction: "How can he solve that thing without looking? It must have braille on it or something".
Haha!My favourite reaction: "How can he solve that thing without looking? It must have braille on it or something".
... Otherwise we will have more of those non-cbers saying "hey! you're just following a pattern You are cheating" etc.
Clearly you don't understand the format of the show. To which it is not there responsibility to make cubing recognised. It's a tiny hobby. If you want recognition go play a major sport or something.
CFOP isn't a known method? News to me.Well that can be proven wrong quite easily by the way he solved it. He didn't use a known method.
Agreed.I find the biggest problem on this thread not to be the fake solves (and personally, I do find it impressive that he memorised all those moves whether he did it with a conventional BLD method or (almost certainly as he seems to indicate) not) but rather the people who have turned this into a thread filled with the lowest form of verbal taunting.
Oh. I got the guys mixed up there. And he must be terrible at 2x2 because he went hype for getting a 3 second solve...CFOP isn't a known method? News to me.
Anyway, a lot of people are talking about this guy as if he isn't a speedcuber. He actually has a sub-10 single and a mid 10 average in an official comp, and has had several BLD successes in competition, so it's not like he doesn't know how to do it legitimately. He obviously just felt his performance would be better the way he did it.
Agreed.
So, here is my take on it:
...
So, were the solves fake? Most likely. Whatever method he was using was not a blind method, but instead one that takes planning ahead of time... at home... on a scramble generator...
The Real Question is Why? Did you really have to fake it?