Luis
Regular
This is because your user name or password are not correct. You a have a 'forgotten' link useful for these cases.I registered on monday, and since I was able to log once on the site. Now if I type in my log/pwd, nothing happens !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is because your user name or password are not correct. You a have a 'forgotten' link useful for these cases.I registered on monday, and since I was able to log once on the site. Now if I type in my log/pwd, nothing happens !
This is obvious, and I've BEEN saying that.
Impractical means "not practical."
Not practical =/= fast.
Practical = fast.
It's more practical to glance at how close you are to the left side, to see how well you are doing among others. This is a much faster way to figure out your standing, then what you suggested.
What you suggested was an impractical way to figure out your standing, which means it's not as fast.
Now, you're talking about the coding, and not about the user end of things.
Please, pick one side of the argument, so we're on the same page.
Yes, usually things that are practical are faster than when it's impractical. Including this case.I meant to write ""practical=/=fast".
Yes, but what's even more sensible, is to see your placing in the columns.Looking at the avg number on top is a sensible way to find out how fast you are.
Again, you're talking about something different. It's more practical to just see what place you are in the columns.I DOn't find it practical for the columns to switch places every round, potentially causing unwanted lag/delay
It's not "just look at the top." You also have to then look at everyone else's time, and compare yourself to their times, to determine your placing.you can really, just look at the top, which is already a fast enough way.
one of my Dad's pet peeves is that I can't download any new internet browsers:fp
"Dad" and "I" are seperate entities
Plus he's not one of those stupid people that tell their kids not to do something, but aren't stupid enough to know when they do it.
Yes, usually things that are practical are faster than when it's impractical. Including this case.
Yes, but what's even more sensible, is to see your placing in the columns.
Again, you're talking about something different. It's more practical to just see what place you are in the columns.
I agree that the lag/delay is unwanted, but it doesn't change the fact that looking at your column position is a faster way to determine your placing.
We're talking about 2 separate things.
-Ease and speed of looking at column placement to determine our placing
-Lag/delay of having the columns switch
It's not "just look at the top." You also have to then look at everyone else's time, and compare yourself to their times, to determine your placing.
You say it's fast enough,. But, you cannot deny that a glance at your column placing wouldn't be even faster.
Yes, this is actually a perfect compromise! Very good.How about when luis makes the code for the columns switching it can be turned on and off. For the people who already have lagging problems, they don't have to deal with the extra lag. The for the people who want the feature, can turn it on.
Me too. I really like the way the host is decided right now.The only problem is deciding the host which I think should stay the way that it is.
Yes, this is actually a perfect compromise! Very good.
Luis doesn't have an opinion... Luis have lot of work to do!If you don't mind me asking, Luis, what is your opinion on this topic?
E3cubestore, I've been debugging the problem for a while (can reproduce it in an IE7 here) and is the tipical thing that shouldn't fail... but it does.
Screenshot & browser version, please.
and i am unable to get my picture tagged to a URL, I am not very tech savvy
Try http://tinypic.com/ where you can upload it and then get forum code to copy and paste here.