www.twisttheweb.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is obvious, and I've BEEN saying that.
Impractical means "not practical."
Not practical =/= fast.
Practical = fast.

It's more practical to glance at how close you are to the left side, to see how well you are doing among others. This is a much faster way to figure out your standing, then what you suggested.

What you suggested was an impractical way to figure out your standing, which means it's not as fast.

I meant to write ""practical=/=fast". Looking at the avg number on top is a sensible way to find out how fast you are.






Now, you're talking about the coding, and not about the user end of things.
Please, pick one side of the argument, so we're on the same page.

Actually, I was talked about this already. The definition of practical is "sensible or realistic" and I DOn't find it practical for the columns to switch places every round, potentially causing unwanted lag/delay in time when you can really, just look at the top, which is already a fast enough way.
 
Last edited:
I meant to write ""practical=/=fast".
Yes, usually things that are practical are faster than when it's impractical. Including this case.



Looking at the avg number on top is a sensible way to find out how fast you are.
Yes, but what's even more sensible, is to see your placing in the columns.



I DOn't find it practical for the columns to switch places every round, potentially causing unwanted lag/delay
Again, you're talking about something different. It's more practical to just see what place you are in the columns.
I agree that the lag/delay is unwanted, but it doesn't change the fact that looking at your column position is a faster way to determine your placing.

We're talking about 2 separate things.
-Ease and speed of looking at column placement to determine our placing
-Lag/delay of having the columns switch



you can really, just look at the top, which is already a fast enough way.
It's not "just look at the top." You also have to then look at everyone else's time, and compare yourself to their times, to determine your placing.
You say it's fast enough,. But, you cannot deny that a glance at your column placing wouldn't be even faster.
 
Twisttheweb problem.jpg

This is a screenshot of my problem,
I have IE7, so that's probably the problem.

However, one of my Dad's pet peeves is that I can't download any new internet browsers:fp
 
Well, downloading it would be kind of an obvious giveaway that I hacked the admin account ;)

Getting him to download a new browser is easy though, just bug him to get the next browser, and 8 months later he will, right after they release 2 more! lol, that's actually how it works around here.
 
While that statement might have been poorly worded, it's obvious that "Dad" and "I" are seperate entities, because it makes absolutely no sense to switch from 3rd person in my perspective, to first person in his perspective, in the middle of my sentence.

The fact of that matter is, he won't let me modify, add, or remove programs on the computer. Plus he's not one of those stupid people that tell their kids not to do something, but aren't stupid enough to know when they do it.
 
Yes, usually things that are practical are faster than when it's impractical. Including this case.




Yes, but what's even more sensible, is to see your placing in the columns.




Again, you're talking about something different. It's more practical to just see what place you are in the columns.
I agree that the lag/delay is unwanted, but it doesn't change the fact that looking at your column position is a faster way to determine your placing.

We're talking about 2 separate things.
-Ease and speed of looking at column placement to determine our placing
-Lag/delay of having the columns switch




It's not "just look at the top." You also have to then look at everyone else's time, and compare yourself to their times, to determine your placing.
You say it's fast enough,. But, you cannot deny that a glance at your column placing wouldn't be even faster.

How about when luis makes the code for the columns switching it can be turned on and off. For the people who already have lagging problems, they don't have to deal with the extra lag. The for the people who want the feature, can turn it on.
The only problem is deciding the host which I think should stay the way that it is.

If you don't mind me asking, Luis, what is your opinion on this topic?
 
How about when luis makes the code for the columns switching it can be turned on and off. For the people who already have lagging problems, they don't have to deal with the extra lag. The for the people who want the feature, can turn it on.
Yes, this is actually a perfect compromise! Very good.


The only problem is deciding the host which I think should stay the way that it is.
Me too. I really like the way the host is decided right now.
 
E3cubestore, I've been debugging the problem for a while (can reproduce it in an IE7 here) and is the tipical thing that shouldn't fail... but it does. I can't spend much time on this right now, so, my recommendation for you is upgrading. In any other case, you will have to wait, ok? :(

If you don't mind me asking, Luis, what is your opinion on this topic?
Luis doesn't have an opinion... Luis have lot of work to do! ;)

No, seriously: I see the columns fine as they are.
 
I just wanted to mention that the scramble algorithms tend to give easy solves.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top