When can one call oneself a "sub 20 cuber"?

Personally I have always gone by average of 100. I can get sub-15 averages about 10%-20% of my averages, but I haven't yet done it in average of 100. So I still consider myself a sub-16 cuber.

Chris
 
What I do, is I check to see what times are rare for me. For me, 11.xx's are not too common. 12s are common, 13s are common, and 14s are dissapointing. So I call myself a sub 14 cuber.
 
I think it should be when you get a sub-20 avg at a competition, because then u are officially ranked sub-20. That's just my opinion.
Wrong. I average about 17 seconds (signature not up to date) and take a look at my WCA profile. I am sub-20, but I'm by no means sub-16.
 
i think a sub-anything is when the only time you get above that is when..

1. The cube locks up like a cage (if a person is getting sub-20, they shouldnt be having a seriously lock-prone cube)
2. A piece POPS
3. You forget an algorithm
4. You deliberately try to get worse then X.XX times
---
 
I can constantly sub-14 average of 100 so I tell cubers that I'm sub-14. But if you wanna brag among your non-cuber friends, play it safe. Cos once you say you're sub-20 they're gonna assume every solve of yours would be sub-20 (even if they give you a crappy cube to use, etc). So I always tell me non-cube friends I can solve it in "less than 20 seconds", which is pretty safe for me.
 
If I can come back the next day and get the same result on a MEAN of 25 ish or so then I consider that to be my time. I dislike throwing out best and worst. Even though it increases my times mostly.
 
I think it should be when you get a sub-20 avg at a competition, because then u are officially ranked sub-20. That's just my opinion.
I got a sub 20 avg at comp...but I don't call myself sub 20...

I usually tell ppl my average is between 20~22 seconds...

I judge my times by avg of 100...like I get avg of 100 20.3x then the other time 21.6x then 21.1x etc...I just estimate a gap between 20~22 seconds which I usally will get on avg of 100..if avg of 100 would to reach 17~19 each time..then only I would call myself sub 20...:)

Well...you can tell ppl that u r sub 20..but you are just lying to yourself..I know some people that says their sub xx.. and later on they get times 5~10 seconds more than what they said..my mind would just think the person is saying best avg of 5..:p

is just like my sq-1 avg of 5 is like 23.xx..but my avg of 100 is like 32~34..almost 10 secs diff from my avg of 5...in no way am I going to lie to myself..:fp
 
well in OH i already got a 17.66 average of 12 and i am definitely not sub20
average of 100 is 19.94 but well i would say if you get an average of 1000 which is sub20 then you are a sub20 cuber(mine is 20.66 xD)
 
I think we are coming to a slight consensus here-it's what's common. I can calmly get a 23 second solve. So when people ask me, "How fast can you solve it?" I can with confidence tell them, "20-25 seconds." So if they give me a cube and I'm sitting down at a computer, I can get that or faster, without having to overexert myself. In short, a sub-20 cuber is someone who can just pick up the cube and get an 18 second solve without feeling like a G. And otherwise, I agree with the person who said that sub-20 is when you get pissed if you get something like 26 seconds (like me-I'm my biggest critic).
 
Back
Top