What would your method be if you had to switch now.

[PetrusQuber]

So yeah, title says it all. Basically, lets say you use CFOP. Well, BOOM CFOP is illegal. What method would you switch to? Thought it would be fun to see other people’s choices.
Mine is:
Petrus > Petrus-W > LEOR > ZZ
Very original, I know. And it has to have a solid step where it is significantly different from your original method. (Different algorithms used probably shouldn’t count. e.g. CFOP to CFCE)

 

[ProStar]

Darn I was gonna say after CFOP->CFCE->CFEC lol

I'd probably use CFOP(current)->Petrus->Roux->->Petrus-W->ZZ(reluctantly)

 

[Deleted member 51471]

ZZ (current) > Petrus-W > Portico > Petrus > Roux > PCMS > LEOR > CFOP (relunctantly)
Take THAT @ProStar !

 

[ProStar]

Oh forgot a couple method that I know:

CFOP->Petrus->Roux->Petrus-W->PCMS(my varient)->PCMS(mine and WCCs variant)->ZZ->PCMS(normal)->A bad Petrus/CFOP variant I made up(F2L-1 before EO) (reluctantly)

 

[fuzzballcat]

Double-square -> Roux -> Petrus -> Waterman -> ZZ -> Corners-first -> Quit cubing (I will never surrender to CFOP!)

 

[brododragon]

Roux. I’m too lazy to make a list

 

[Deleted member 52530]

yeas i know..... i will go

CFOP>1L>RTS

 

[PetrusQuber]

What’s RTS?

 

[Deleted member 52530]

reverse the scramble

 

[PetrusQuber]

Nice... (Be the guy at the competition who tries to sit right next to the scrambler in the scrambling table, inly to realise he’s using a Gan 356 i)

 

[CodingCuber]

CFOP>Petrus>Roux>Secret method I’m working on

 

[Llewelys]

CFOP > Roux > 3-style > Speed Heise

 

[VIBE_ZT]

Being a good friend of Sean Villanueva, I'd definitely go for Roux. If that also wasn't available for whatever reason, I would probably look into ZZ and try to implement EO-Cross. That seems like it would be the best thing for me.

I would consider Petrus too, but it would inevitably be slower due to having to figure out EO in the literal middle of a solve. So idk if thats a good idea.

 

[PetrusQuber]

EO is really fast, takes me around 1.1 seconds, and I’m only sub 18.

 

[dudefaceguy]

Roux(current) > Heise > Petrus variants

I started with Heise and still use it for doing one-handed linear FMC on the subway. I hate learning algorithms so it'll have to be intuitive methods for me.

 

[Etotheipi]

Roux-->ZZ

 

[Hazel]

I currently use CFOP, but I plan on switching to Leor once I know more of ZBLL.
Leor -> ZBRoux -> Petrus

 

[ProStar]

I currently use CFOP, but I plan on switching to Leor once I know more of ZBLL.
Leor -> ZBRoux -> Petrus

You could probably use some sort of phasing or zz-blah technique and switch sooner

 

[Deleted member 36445]

Cfop->Roux

because blockbuilding, no rotations and the ending is kewl

 

[Tao Yu]

3-style is a really satisfying method to solve with, I find that it's the method I use the most now when doing sighted untimed solves. I'd probably switch to that since I don't care too much about speed anymore. After that, Roux.

You could probably use some sort of phasing or zz-blah technique and switch sooner

Why not just OLL and PLL? Not knowing cases can motive you to finish ZBLL