DuckubingCuber347
Member
Only 4? It feel like 8.4 copies of the same cube in 10 months. Thats actually a record for gan!
Only 4? It feel like 8.4 copies of the same cube in 10 months. Thats actually a record for gan!
And you still end up with a $10 cube that costs $24.I hate when people complain about how expensive Gan’s flagships are and then further complain when they strip out luxury features to bring the cube to more accessible price points.
Purple edition, and the 4 translucent ones too.Gan 11 M Pro Primary Internals, Gan 11 M pro Black Internals, Gan 11 M pro Stickered, Gan 11 M Pro Soft Coated, Gan 11 M Pro UV Coated, Gan 11 M Duo, Gan 11 M, Gan 11 Air.
@Thecubingcuber347 you're right, there are eight versions of the Gan 11 M pro, unless I missed something.
Only 4? It feel like 8.
Gan 11 M Pro Primary Internals, Gan 11 M pro Black Internals, Gan 11 M pro Stickered, Gan 11 M Pro Soft Coated, Gan 11 M Pro UV Coated, Gan 11 M Duo, Gan 11 M, Gan 11 Air.
@Thecubingcuber347 you're right, there are eight versions of the Gan 11 M pro, unless I missed something.
To be bluntly honest .... If you are not going to be buying a GAN cube, why even bother complaining about how many different options there are ? Regardless of how many options there are, why continue to whine about it. It's really getting tired. We've all heard all of this before .... flogging a dead horse here ....And you still end up with a $10 cube that costs $24.
Would I carry be one technicallyGan 11 M Pro Primary Internals, Gan 11 M pro Black Internals, Gan 11 M pro Stickered, Gan 11 M Pro Soft Coated, Gan 11 M Pro UV Coated, Gan 11 M Duo, Gan 11 M, Gan 11 Air.
@Thecubingcuber347 you're right, there are eight versions of the Gan 11 M pro, unless I missed something.
I've owned a bunch of Gan cubes - at least 10. It's not whining to point out that they're releasing a non-magnetic 3x3 for roughly the same price as Qiyi's latest flagship. Or to note that their cubes are consistently significantly more than other cubes in the same space. To use Zain's analogy, does Samsung stripped down phones that cost more than OnePlus flagships? No? There ya go.To be bluntly honest .... If you are not going to be buying a GAN cube, why even bother complaining about how many different options there are ? Regardless of how many options there are, why continue to whine about it. It's really getting tired. We've all heard all of this before .... flogging a dead horse here ....
OnePlus used to be known for very affordable flagships (which are replaced with their Nord line) while Samsung wasn't really pushing the budget market so much at the time compared to nowTo use Zain's analogy, does Samsung stripped down phones that cost more than OnePlus flagships? No? There ya go.
That isn't really relevant to my comment. I'm talking right now. Gan has less-featured cubes (their new non-mag) that cost as much as other companies' flagship (Tornado v2). That would be like Samsung - NOW - charging more their reduced feature phones than OnePlus charges for a flagship. Doesn't happen.OnePlus used to be known for very affordable flagships (which are replaced with their Nord line) while Samsung wasn't really pushing the budget market so much at the time compared to now
Totally get your points and agree that sure point out that their bottom-end cubes cost more than competitors flagships. However when I see this mentioned in almost every post about GAN when they release a new cube or version of a cube, I call it whining, and I'm over it. I get that people in general like to complain about things, I do it myself every time Apple releases a new phone at twice the price of the "old" one.I've owned a bunch of Gan cubes - at least 10. It's not whining to point out that they're releasing a non-magnetic 3x3 for roughly the same price as Qiyi's latest flagship. Or to note that their cubes are consistently significantly more than other cubes in the same space. To use Zain's analogy, does Samsung stripped down phones that cost more than OnePlus flagships? No? There ya go.
Interesting, I have been considering getting it, have you tried any of the yuxin little magic giant cubes? How does it compare?Anyone else got the MFJS Meilong 13x13?
Amazingly good turning for such a big cube, so potentially quite speed solvable!
And its cubic, not pillowed.
Yes, I have tried the Yuxin LM 10x10 & 11x11, but while they turn very smoothly and seem stable, their extra size and weight makes them more difficult for me to handle, and slower to solve, than the MFJS equivalents, so I definitely prefer the latter.Interesting, I have been considering getting it, have you tried any of the yuxin little magic giant cubes? How does it compare?
give the cubes to a real big cube solver for 5 seconds and they'll tell you how good it really isDiensheng’s doing some more stuff: