Upcoming puzzles

If this were to happen I think what would make the most sense would be to continue to collect new puzzle announcements and their release info here in this thread, and then create a thread for each puzzle worth discussing to have discussions on it.

I thought that's exactly what happened. This thread is a general discussion of new and upcoming puzzles. And the ones that are more popular/deserving/whatever get their own thread.
 
It looks to me like the 'ball core' is simply a spherical shape moulded at the centre of of the core. It doesn't look to be part of the mechanism. If I'm correct, it's simply marketing hot air.. I liked how their marketing images were all purple cubes, just like another manufacturers marketing images, lol.
 
It looks to me like the 'ball core' is simply a spherical shape moulded at the centre of of the core. It doesn't look to be part of the mechanism. If I'm correct, it's simply marketing hot air.. I liked how their marketing images were all purple cubes, just like another manufacturers marketing images, lol.
I thought it would be magnets embedded into the ball core and magnets in the base of the corners like on the gan 12. that would be useful but in the gan they put the magnets directly on the spider core
 
In post 4836, the first IG link mentions magnetic repulsion of the corner core magnets between being in position (45deg). There may be opposite pole magnets embedded in the ball at the half rotation position, if I'm reading it correctly? If that's the case, it is a step in added features. Though coming after the edge/core repulsion magnets from Gan, in the 13.

When pondering possible innovations in cube design some time ago, I did think about all the cubies not actually touching each other, having a tiny gap. It seems the latest repulsion designs are leaning towards that direction.
 
Honestly, I only see a cube as being good if it could perform decently without needing tons of magnets.

I say this because when those magnets disengage, the true stability of a puzzle will come right out. Too many companies are occupied with innovating magnets that they started to care less about the actual mechanism of the cubes themselves. Nowadays, innovation on a mechanism is more or less adding a mesh pattern and changing how the cubies are split.

It's part of the reason why I give the original tengyun a lot of credit. It is very unique in terms of design choices and it doesn't need an absurd amount of magnet technology to be lauded as a serious product. This cube reminds me of when innovation was actually in the mechanism and not in the adjustment technology
 
Last edited:
Am I the only one with the opinion that the ball core+maglev rs3m no longer counts as a budget cube, but as an outright flagship?

I'd hardly call the ball core/maglev version a "Budget" cube anymore when it's basically priced as a flagship cube now. Granted it's a few dollars cheaper, but It's not like the original rs3m2020 where you could get two for the price of one flagship; nowadays it's a small handful of dollars off.

My guess MoYu is trying to get away with calling the ball core/maglev a "budget cube with premium features," therefore using this moniker as a method to generate extra sales. Yet, with its price tag, I hardly see that as being the case anymore, especially when it's in the price bracket of other flagships. For only few extra dollars, you can get both of the newer tornadoes (v2 and v3), the wrm 2021 lite, The original Valk, Tengyun v1, Tianma Standard AND Enhanced, and a couple of the non-adjustable GAN cubes (356 Air M, 356 M, and 354v2M.)

Provided, for the price, you do get a couple neat features, but at the same time, other cubes in its very same price range have adjustable magnet strengths (The Weilong WRM 2021 and Tornado base models), which this does not. Furthermore, the price of this cube puts it right in the line of fire of the Tianma Enhanced, which is honestly an incredible cube witj the same level of customization and foot magnets (Which more or less have similar homing properties as corner-core).

To paraphrase my argument, I'm not saying the rs3m super ball/maglev is bad. What I'm trying to say is that it no longer really counts as being a budget cube, and therefore shouldn't really be treated as one.

I would count the standard as a high-end budget cube, and the maglev as a midrange, as it's technically in the pricerange of the tianma standard edition.
 
It's $12 at Cubezz. It's a budget cube.

Cubezz and Ziicube don't typically sell cubes at the prices that manufacturers want them to be sold at.

The Tianma's standard and enhanced versions are also much cheaper too, and that's hardly considered a "budget" option, along with the MGC Elite v2, which, while archaic, is still a YJ Flagship.

The wrm 2021 is only 17.00 too, the tornado v2 at 18.00. I'd hardly call those midrange options at that pricing.
 
Last edited:
Am I the only one with the opinion that the ball core+maglev rs3m no longer counts as a budget cube, but as an outright flagship?

I'd hardly call the ball core/maglev version a "Budget" cube anymore when it's basically priced as a flagship cube now. Granted it's a few dollars cheaper, but It's not like the original rs3m2020 where you could get two for the price of one flagship; nowadays it's a small handful of dollars off.

My guess MoYu is trying to get away with calling the ball core/maglev a "budget cube with premium features," therefore using this moniker as a method to generate extra sales. Yet, with its price tag, I hardly see that as being the case anymore, especially when it's in the price bracket of other flagships. For only few extra dollars, you can get both of the newer tornadoes (v2 and v3), the wrm 2021 lite, The original Valk, Tengyun v1, Tianma Standard AND Enhanced, and a couple of the non-adjustable GAN cubes (356 Air M, 356 M, and 354v2M.)

Provided, for the price, you do get a couple neat features, but at the same time, other cubes in its very same price range have adjustable magnet strengths (The Weilong WRM 2021 and Tornado base models), which this does not. Furthermore, the price of this cube puts it right in the line of fire of the Tianma Enhanced, which is honestly an incredible cube witj the same level of customization and foot magnets (Which more or less have similar homing properties as corner-core).

To paraphrase my argument, I'm not saying the rs3m super ball/maglev is bad. What I'm trying to say is that it no longer really counts as being a budget cube, and therefore shouldn't really be treated as one.

I would count the standard as a high-end budget cube, and the maglev as a midrange, as it's technically in the pricerange of the tianma standard edition.
to me a budget cube can still be a flagship cube as long as it had flagship performance
 
Back
Top