• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

TN method (new method for 3x3 speedsolving ?)

Basically learn TOLS and normal TTLL first. Then depending where the dfr corner is Use a different alg to force The other sets of TTLL or to Force PLL. You can basically take the good things from what you've made and add them to the ribbon method for more of an option select.
Ribbon method requires the FR edge to be solved while TN method does not.
If TN method also forces to a TTLL set, TNLS will have a lot of algs. Currently TNLS only uses OLL, OLS-FE, VLS, they are very familiar.
 
Ribbon method requires the FR edge to be solved while TN method does not.
If TN method also forces to a TTLL set, TNLS will have a lot of algs. Currently TNLS only uses OLL, OLS-FE, VLS, they are very familiar.
Changing one small detail in a method and calling it something completely different doesn't make it a different new method. If these steps are similar to another method, and the same algsets are being used, chances are: It doesn't count as a new method!!
In fact, I am familiar with how to recognize TNLS and do not need to do as in the video. But this is a guide for beginners so I have to do each recognition case.
If recog for this step is that difficult, that would make it less practical for speedsolving. Even other methods in their beginner form or advanced form are simple in concept regardless. Just because you may have done some solves using this recog method, that doesn't mean it's automatically optimal!
 
Changing one small detail in a method and calling it something completely different doesn't make it a different new method. If these steps are similar to another method, and the same algsets are being used, chances are: It doesn't count as a new method!!

If recog for this step is that difficult, that would make it less practical for speedsolving. Even other methods in their beginner form or advanced form are simple in concept regardless. Just because you may have done some solves using this recog method, that doesn't mean it's automatically optimal!
I was offering this streamlined recog method
 
Back
Top