Should I Switch To Petrus? (Vid Included)

[miniGOINGS]

42 CMLL cases, 40 COLL cases.

 

[Cyrus C.]

What's the difference between CMLL & COLL?

I think you should switch, this thread made me switch back to Petrus, & I'm down to 25, almost my Fridrich times, in just a day.

 

[miniGOINGS]

Well, in CMLL, if the corners are oriented correctly, you still have to permute them. There are 2 algs for this (adjacent and opposite). In COLL, if the corners are oriented correctly it would be best to just use PLL.

 

[Cyrus C.]

Oh... what's the M for?

 

[miniGOINGS]

Oh... what's the M for?

Let me find the way I put this earlier...

 

[miniGOINGS]

Corners of the INTERUPTION!: Does not preserve the U-layer edges or the M-ring. END OF INTERUPTION! Last Layer.

 

[Rikane]

The corners generate eight configurations of orientations (if you look at what should be U color) and six possible permutation cases. No need to learn 6x8=48 cases. For many of them, it's only a matter of symmetry, or applying a reverse sequence. You have to remember "only" 24 unique sequences if you want to master this step

This is what I was talking about.

 

[miniGOINGS]

Ahh...

 

[BigGreen]

Second, a typical Roux solve uses 1 or 2 algorithms, you already know all of the 2 look algs.

why dont you count EO algs or 4c algs?

 

[Am1n-]

EO and 4c are quite intuitive. I never looked them up...

mvg

 

[BigGreen]

EO and 4c are quite intuitive. I never looked them up...

mvg

i never looked them up too but i still count them as algs because i do them the same way every time unlike the blocks which are always different

 

[jms_gears1]

EO and 4c are quite intuitive. I never looked them up...

mvg

i never looked them up too but i still count them as algs because i do them the same way every time unlike the blocks which are always different

i wouldnt count them as algs...

 

[Am1n-]

EO and 4c are quite intuitive. I never looked them up...

mvg

i never looked them up too but i still count them as algs because i do them the same way every time unlike the blocks which are always different

In that reasoning:
fridrich F2L: there are only so many ways to put in a CEpair in a slot, and most of the people do them always the same way (the optimal way), therefore there are [put in a number] algs for intuitive F2L.

 

[BigGreen]

EO and 4c are quite intuitive. I never looked them up...

mvg

i never looked them up too but i still count them as algs because i do them the same way every time unlike the blocks which are always different

In that reasoning:
fridrich F2L: there are only so many ways to put in a CEpair in a slot, and most of the people do them always the same way (the optimal way), therefore there are [put in a number] algs for intuitive F2L.

sure why not

 

[Am1n-]

EO and 4c are quite intuitive. I never looked them up...

mvg

i never looked them up too but i still count them as algs because i do them the same way every time unlike the blocks which are always different

In that reasoning:
fridrich F2L: there are only so many ways to put in a CEpair in a slot, and most of the people do them always the same way (the optimal way), therefore there are [put in a number] algs for intuitive F2L.

sure why not

In that reasoning: when you improve on a method, you'll be able to recognize more paterns, which conclude to an algorithm, therefore the number of algs in a method will increase tremendously.
Therefore patern recognition wouldn't exist anymore, it is now called algorithm...
It's not that I cannot follow in your logic, it just doesn't seem to confirm with regular thinking paterns of the majority of the people (in my opinion, which isn't at all confirmed by statistical prove, only by intuition).

anyway, maybe we'll have to discuss this in another thread because we're going seriously off-topic and since I don't have anything usefull to say to the OP I won't continue this discussion on this time nor place

mvg

 

[jms_gears1]

whats OP stand for?

and to the author: as you progress make vids as a video log i wish i had...

 

[Cyrus C.]

So... did you switch? If so' race to Sub 20 AO12?

 

[Am1n-]

whats OP stand for?

and to the author: as you progress make vids as a video log i wish i had...

OP= original poster

mvg

 

[hyunchoi98]

I think the method you use is all personal preference.
I think so but you shouldn't take much of my advice
'cause i still use beginner's method.

 

[Deleted member 2864]

Give it a try if you like it Personally, I prefer algs to blockbuilding, but if it works for you them by all means try it!