zmikecuber
Regular
That is the only kind of evidence anyone can provide.
great evidence bro
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is the only kind of evidence anyone can provide.
Because God came as the Son and founded it.
ok sorry, I probably talked your ear off... hahaa!pretty obvious Im a "religious nut". ;D
Yes, this is what you believe. My question was, what makes that belief more correct than others?
There are people just like you who believe a similar story with a similar book written during a similar time. They believe this just as strongly, if not stronger than you believe that your god came down through his son's body and created Christianity. What makes your's correct and their's wrong?
well first of all, its not just MY opinion. its the Catholic Church, which has existed for a VERY long time.
the historical parts of the bible claim to be written by eye witness writers.
how do we know any history? we find that somebody wrote it down... we find things which prove this.
how do we know any history for sure? I guess we dont know it for sure, but I dont see anybody here claiming that Alexander the Great in reality never existed...
EDIT: sorry for the caps locks... I know I hate it when people do that too.... heh heh
Truthfully that says little and in all honesty that's an arrogant assumption to make. You're basically saying since I'm not sure you must be right.Which is why atheists are probably right.
Religion has little to do with people doing good or bad things. If religion is the only thing thats keeping you from killing people, you belong in a mental hospital.
well first of all, its not just MY opinion. its the Catholic Church, which has existed for a VERY long time.
the historical parts of the bible claim to be written by eye witness writers.
how do we know any history? we find that somebody wrote it down... we find things which prove this.
how do we know any history for sure? I guess we dont know it for sure, but I dont see anybody here claiming that Alexander the Great in reality never existed...
EDIT: sorry for the caps locks... I know I hate it when people do that too.... heh heh
Truthfully that says little and in all honesty that's an arrogant assumption to make. Your basically saying since I'm not sure you must be right.
You misinterpreted what I was saying there I was referring to my idea of heaven not directly to religion.Also I must mention that your example is a little bit extreme.
If none of the religions have convincing evidence of anything, it would be most reasonable to reject all of them.Truthfully that says little and in all honesty that's an arrogant assumption to make. Your basically saying since I'm not sure you must be right.
If none of the religions have convincing evidence of anything, it would be most reasonable to reject all of them.
How is that arrogant?
Absolutes are usually terrible in these types of arguments.
The arrogance doesn't lie in the evidence, it stems from the argument that your ideas must be correct due to assumption.If none of the religions have convincing evidence of anything, it would be most reasonable to reject all of them.
How is that arrogant?
The arrogance doesn't lie in the evidence, it stems from the argument that your ideas must be correct due to assumption.
Truthfully that says little and in all honesty that's an arrogant assumption to make. You're basically saying since I'm not sure you must be right.
Science proved how the universe began.
Well, *ehm*, they're working on it.
Also chill bros, threads get locked when things get uncivilized. Just saying.