Proposed ZZLS and VIM!

SenileGenXer

Regular
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Messages
206
Location
Virginia, USA
NOTE this post has be completely edited from it's original content. I am trying to present what I am thinking more clearly. I have also re-designed this whole thing. VIM! is vanquished and Excalibur substituted. I said something off-hand about how many F2L pairs Matz Valk could do on inspection and a whole lot of people wanted to argue about that.

This is my proposed Last Layer Skip. The Lewis-LS.

It starts like this. You solve the cross and the first three F2L cases. You make your last F2L pair so that it is's white face is pointing clockwise and you trap the oriented front color edge. Orient the rest of your edges if you need to. This forms a pattern I will call the Copperhead after a venomous Virginia snake. Visualize it as snake. The F2L pair and the front color edge form the head and mouth respectively. The pieces that would be scrambled by the sexy move are the serpent's body. The open corner positions have been labeled 1 2 3 and 4.

Copperhead.gif

The next step is to permute and orient the RF color corner piece (primary piece) into position 4 with it's up side facing right while also just permuting the LB color corner piece (secondary) into position 3. If we wanted to make an alg for every case I think we would have 36 cases. We could label the cases like P2U1 where the primary piece is in position 2 with it's U face color up and the secondary piece is in position 1. For solving these cases everything along the Copperhead's body is swapable except edge orientation. Orienting the permuting the primary piece while permuting the secondary forms a case I will call Excalibur. We will call this step forging.

Excalibur.gif

Behold the sword of power! Forged when the world was young and and man and beast were one and death was but a dream!

The picture is all there is to it. Picture it as a sword standing upright along the front right. The handle is solid and material, the blade is oriented but not permuted, the tip is permuted but not oriented. There can be nine concrete incarnations but we'll call them all Excalibur.

Once the we have forged excalibur inside the Copperhead serpent there are 9 corner orientations possible we can see them fairly easily looking at the up face colors.

Corner-O-Cases-corrected.gif

In addition we have only 6 crypto PLL's possible after forging excalibur (Solved, an N-Perm, V, Y, Ua, and a Ub). We could label them S, N, V,Y, A, and B. Reconition is probably awful. Nine corner orientations times 6 crypto PLLs gives us 54 cases. Solving from excalibur to a finished cube might be called wielding.

The algs to wield Excalibur can have a great overlap with the algs that forge Excalibur. That is I expect a great number of them could be executed by exactly the same alg. There is incredible alg reuse.

I may develop tables for forging and wielding and fill them in with optimal HTM solutions from cube explorer. I expect these algs to be very very short. A few sexy alternativs are possible as well.

If you would like to help maybe you could start a WIKI article for the Lewis-LS so we could all contribute? If you would like to calculate some algs I would suggest wielding cases first then note what they do for forging cases and add them there as well.

I am only human and I make a lot of mistakes. I am sure there are mistakes in this if you see some let me know. I have stumbled blind in the vast unknown. I groped for things in that I did not know and pulled out something true. It is a very strange feeling. Take this truth, this technique and make it yours.
 

Attachments

  • Copperhead.gif
    Copperhead.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 118
  • CopperheadPlus1.gif
    CopperheadPlus1.gif
    4.2 KB · Views: 63
  • VIM.gif
    VIM.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 63
  • Corner-orentation-Cases.gif
    Corner-orentation-Cases.gif
    30 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:
I'm having a lot of difficulty following your method.
Please post a few example solves?

I'm sorry. The heavens opened up and the angels screamed at me. A choir sang the Ode to Joy really loud. I touched the face of God and unleashed a dragon named VIM!

I'm kinda burnt out. I not gonna post a video on this. I haven't done many cases except C1S. I need time to recover.

Make yourself a table for the VIM configuration. Write the corner cases on one edge, the PLL's on the other and fill it with algs & pictures. You'll be a better cuber.

Kirjava: Some things are sacred. Don't troll this thread. I await meaningful replies here.
 
Last edited:
It's probably best to not call legitimate criticism trolling, and I'd rather you didn't.

You might want to be pandering to the people that find your description vague lest this soon fades into obscurity.
 
So ... you seriously think he can plan his Cross + 3 Pairs in inspection?

He had a video explaining his solve where he came very close or actually did it. It's tremendous look-a-head. He does blue or green cross and decides what side gives him the best F2L cases and does a few of those during inspection. I bet sometimes he gets to three. It's stunning.
 
Last edited:
This makes absolutely no sense to me. Your pictures have green and blue on opposite sides of the cube, yet you have a corner piece with both green and blue on it?
 
This makes absolutely no sense to me. Your pictures have green and blue on opposite sides of the cube, yet you have a corner piece with both green and blue on it?

OOPs! The blue in the UFR corner in the diagrams is supposed to be white. Thank you for pointing that out. The whole RF area is supposed to be setup to be solved with R U' R'. I am abandoning VIM! and working out the algs to forge and use a different case to be called Excalibur. I will update as soon as I see for myself how every case works out.
 
Last edited:
So if I interpret your very vaguely worded post correctly, the method you're proposing involves setting up a WV case, using some basic algs to manipulate the permutation of the corners, then solving it using a set of WV+PLL algs?
 
So if I interpret your very vaguely worded post correctly, the method you're proposing involves setting up a WV case, using some basic algs to manipulate the permutation of the corners, then solving it using a set of WV+PLL algs?

Yep, very close. I am engineering a 2-look last layer skip. Trying to make it as 2gen and rotation free as I can.

I runs like this; setup a copperhead case. The edge that should end up at RF is caught in it's mouth. The corner orientations (similar to OLL) are very like some of the RLS-WV cases.

I'm working on a table to position and orient one corner piece while only permuting a second corner. The empty positions on the sexy move line are swap space. There are 36 cases needed. Some algs can be re-used for more than one case. Worst case I believe is 14 moves HTM. These would "forge Excalibur". This is somewhat like doing OLL.

Then I need another set of algs to directly solve the cube. With what I am thinking there would be 28 algs needed. Incredibly short algs. I've done one Excalibur solve. Last look recognition was easy considering it was the first time ever and 10 moves HTM.

I want it to be two-look and good enough to eventually displace solving to the final layer. I want someone better than me at speed to take this to a sub 5 second WR.

This is just a proposal. Other people are free to "forge" other sword cases and see if they can come up with something better.
 
Last edited:
He had a video explaining his solve where he came very close or actually did it. It's tremendous look-a-head. He does blue or green cross and decides what side gives him the best F2L cases and does a few of those during inspection. I bet sometimes he gets to three. It's stunning.

He sees one pair during inspection or during the making of the cross. He will only see 2 if it is REALLY easy. Given he's planned his Cross+1 sometimes, he can look ahead for the next 2 pairs whilst doing them. He does not plan that many during inspection.
 
NOTE this post has be completely edited from it's original content. I am trying to present what I am thinking more clearly.

Are you honestly trying to do this? Because it is still so unclear. People ask you for example solves for clarity but you just seem to be telling them to document it themselves. I asked if anyone on IRC understood you and everyone there seemed to have trouble.

Your ludicrous use of metaphors and verse is the main folly. Since your first post confused people you seem to have obfuscated it further with this fluff.

I said something off-hand about how many F2L pairs Matz Valk could do on inspection and a whole lot of people wanted to argue about that.

Probably because it's the easiest thing for them to read in this thread. Besides, we weren't arguing - we were just correcting your mistake.

This is my proposed Last Layer Skip. The Lewis-LS.

It's a bit rich to call it a last layer skip when you're just conjugating a two look last layer method by RUR'.

In addition we have only 4 crypto PLL's possible after forging excalibur (Solved, an N-Perm, a Ua and a Ub). We could label them S, Z, A, and B. We can distinguish them just by the edge colors on the right face. Nine corner orientations times 4 crypto PLLs gives us 36 cases again. Solving from excalibur to a finished cube might be called wielding.

Your math is bad

2 corner perm * 3^2 corner orient * 3! edge perm /2 parity = 54 cases
 
Are you honestly trying to do this? Because it is still so unclear. People ask you for example solves for clarity but you just seem to be telling them to document it themselves. I asked if anyone on IRC understood you and everyone there seemed to have trouble....

Your math is bad

2 corner perm * 3^2 corner orient * 3! edge perm /2 parity = 54 cases

I'm trying to do this. I will post some algs but I'm slow and picky at that. I want the idea out there in case I get hit by a bus or something. This is a proposal not a walkthrough. If you want to jump ahead and do an example solve work out some algs.

My math is not bad. The corner perm is tied directly to edge perm. When you have the following PLLs (Solved, Na, Ua, and Ub) how many corner cases do you have? For each PLL it's just one.

I'm not with conjugating with R U R'. I using a mental R U' R' to see into the future but not sinking that last F2L pair until the cube is solved.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top