• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Probability Thread

Yeah its crazy. I didnt think itd be that high
Thinking about it more, I think it's actually lower at
1/(18*17*16*..*4*3)

The reason being after 3/4 cross is done, there are 18 positions a wing can be in. So if you randomly choose any wing to start, that removes 1 position so there are now 17 positions the other wing can be in but only 1 would form a paired dedge. Thus 1/18 * 1/17 for one extra dedge being paired which converts to 1/(18*17). Now there are 16 positions. The process repeats. It then stops, ending at 4*3 because once you get down to the last 3 wing locations, 1/3 will form the next to last dedge. It doesn't matter whether the last 2 wings need to swap since we are only concerned with the dedges being paired.
 
a couple of weeks ago, i as solving me mega, got an oll skip on that, then i solved my 3x3 and got an oll skip on that as well. they were like next to next solves. probability pls?
 
If you're asking about exactly that order, then it's 215/10077696 or 0.002%.
@EthanMCuber this is a little misleading - this is the probability of being correct if you were to sit down and say "the next three solves will be OLL skip, not skip, and OLL skip". The probability of it happening anywhere in a session of 100 solves or any time in your entire cubing career or whatever is much much higher.
 
IIRC I edited that in after the initial version of the post and I don't think mentions will show up in your notifs in that case.
Ah I see. That makes sense.
Pretty cool to see I was right at the time. I had a lot of people tell me 3 adj colors was gonna be worse than op dual cross lol.
 
What is the probability of after finishing first three cross edges and finishing the rest of centers on 4x4, that all edges or all but a pair of edges are solved and you skip right into 3x3 stage?
See formula in my older post:
Let \( n \) be the number of edge pair locations in total. (12 for reduction, 9 for Yau after centres and 3/4 cross, 8 for Yau after centres and cross.) The number of ways of pairing up \( 2n \) items, labelled with two copies of \( 0 \) through \( n-1 \), such that no pair has items of the same label, is:
\( \displaystyle a_n:=\sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^k\binom nk(2n-1-2k)!! \)

(Note: !! means double factorial. The number of ways of pairing up \( 2n \) items, ignoring the order of the pairs and the order within the pairs, is \( \frac{(2n)!}{n!2^n}=(2n-1)!! \).)

If we want to count the number of ways to have \( m \) free pairs out of \( N \) total, we first choose which pairs are free (\( \binom Nm \)), then treat the remaining \( N-m \) pairs as an instance of the above problem (\( a_{N-m} \)). To wit:
\( \displaystyle(\text{# of ways to have }m\text{ free pairs out of }N)=\binom Nma_{N-m} \)

Plug in \( N=9 \), and we get:
# pairs# casesprobability
0203148800.58953044
1107160480.31097582
228442880.08254020
35073600.01472340
4685440.00198912
575600.00021939
66720.00001950
7720.00000209
800.00000000
910.00000003

The probability of getting all paired edges is \( 1/17!! = 1/34459425 \approx 0.00000290\% \), while the probability of getting all-but-two paired edges is \( 72/17!! = 72/34459425 \approx 1/479000 \approx 0.000209\% \).
 
Back
Top