ArbishAli
Member
Why are these posts pointless?I personally think Petrus is a good method. I am reacting with eyes up to the posts I think are pointless.
Why are these posts pointless?I personally think Petrus is a good method. I am reacting with eyes up to the posts I think are pointless.
oh ok good point.dont worry,
he just does that to every thing i ever post,
so i ignore him lol
Yes I was going to say that.dont worry,
he just does that to every thing i ever post,
so i ignore him lol
Why are these posts pointless?
Uhm what.yOU nEEd PrOOf tO prOOveE tHe TiNg, YUo KnWO.
Just think about it this way,
its compared to the other big four when
it has barely any users,
and it still has gotten farther than most other uncommon methods.
This makes no sense.another thing is petrus was dead for like 20 years,
and just got brought back from its grave by
petrus quber, tao yu
and eventually me and some others
This makes no sense.Uhm what.
This makes no sense.
This makes no sense.
This is really rude, @Owen Morrison knows perfectly well how to read. This kind of behavior is unacceptable.you need an update on the first one, for sure.
Second one you prob dont understand because you cant read.
Third one same as second.
@Owen Morrison is reacting with eyes up to your posts because you guys are being very immature and making pointless posts that took no thought. Please be professional and add something of value to the current discussion. This is a forum, not a chat room, and spam posts like the ones in this thread are against the rules. Also....
This is really rude, @Owen Morrison knows perfectly well how to read. This kind of behavior is unacceptable.
yes chill pls guys dont just get mad cause of a joke...I dont know about me bieng immature lol,
i was making post with actual points..
It doesn't matter if you were joking, it isn't funny and is not okay. Even if you are joking, someone could be seriously offended. If you are going to continue acting immature, then please just leave.yes chill pls guys dont just get mad cause of a joke...
cool.I myself use Petrus, and started learning almost immediately after I kinda mastered the beginner's method. I think that, besides the things others have already mentioned:
- compared to the beginner's method it seems weird and hard (especially for the blockbuilding and EO)
- most tutorials for switching from beginner to "advanced" don't say anything about other methods and teach CFOP right away
- CFOP is the easiest method to transition to, so why learn something completely different when the best cubers use this method?
- Lars' site isn't the most attractive, even though it has its aesthetic. It looks like something of the first days of the internet. The explanation is pretty good, but who reads these days? Everyone watches tutorials, but not those low quality looking videos, right?
your just like PetrusQuber! Funny he started Petrus because it was a unique method.I use petrus
and average 11-10
depending on how focused/warmed up i am
I started petrus because i was surfing through methods,your just like PetrusQuber! Funny he started Petrus because it was a unique method.
ok lmao i thought this thread was going to be an argument against if Petrus is better or not, but it just became something else,I started petrus because i was surfing through methods,
not knowing which method i liked the most.
eventually i found petrusQuber´s petrus sub 8 post
and tried the method myself.
i just found it the most fun and progressed from sub 25~ to sub 15~ in like two days lol.
(i progressed really quickly because i was already sub 15 with cfop and zz and almost sub 15 with roux)
so i already new how to blockbuild somewhat,
and also had a grasp of eo
It's called constructive criticism, mate.Just think about it this way,
its compared to the other big four when
it has barely any users,
and it still has gotten farther than most other uncommon methods.
Yes you are right.I seriously doubt that Petrus was dead for 20 years.
It's called constructive criticism, mate.
What if they are valid arguments? I'm not trying to say Petrus is bad.ikr they just think their method is better and Petrus is bad, its pretty nice.
This thread will just be about an argument of Petrus, and people fighting over if its bad, or good. Hope the Petrus stands against the haters!
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
S | [Help Thread] Transitioning from Petrus to CFOP? | Cubing Help & Questions | 1 | |
Should I use Petrus | Cubing Help & Questions | 7 | ||
K | [Member Intro] Do you know Fridrich, Roux, AND Petrus? | Member Introductions | 7 | |
Best Petrus? | Cubing Help & Questions | 7 | ||
The Legacy of Petrus | General Speedcubing Discussion | 0 |