SM cubing
Member
Howdy yall, im making this thread because im gonna try and learn OLLCP in its entirety! feel free to discuss algs, share your progress, and give tips on how to learn some of these algs i guess.
Feliks Zemdegs uses OLLCP...the wiki says it's not worth it to learn it all
Does he use full ollcp tho?Feliks Zemdegs uses OLLCP...
This is prodably true, but im gonna explain my reasoning: I like M moves, EPLLs have those, and im way too far into cfop to switch to roux so i figured i might as well learn seperate olls to get epllshttps://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/OLLCP
the wiki says it's not worth it to learn it all
Well if you like M moves you should check out CFCEThis is prodably true, but im gonna explain my reasoning: I like M moves, EPLLs have those, and im way too far into cfop to switch to roux so i figured i might as well learn seperate olls to get eplls
would you say its worth it?Well if you like M moves you should check out CFCE
I'm going to be learning some OLLCP's for fun and for generating some algs with the generators, so I was thinking about what people do for recognition because I think there are 2 main methods to do it and that is to:
(1) In COLL where you AUF your OLL, look at the corners, and do the alg. Or in this case AUF based on the corners, look at the corners, look at how the edges are, do alg.
(2) AUF to where you normally preform the normal OLL alg and recognize CP from there.
I think I like method 1 more.
yes people use ollcp instead of cmll algs to orient edges. just like they said above though its not worth it most of the time.Has anyone implemented this into Roux solves/ have any algs been developed specifically for Roux? Something for dot cases could be nice. Although I'm assuming that EOLR is generally better with the addition of having fewer algs.
Isn't that literally what Pinky Pie is?Has anyone implemented this into Roux solves/ have any algs been developed specifically for Roux? Something for dot cases could be nice. Although I'm assuming that EOLR is generally better with the addition of having fewer algs.