Should I learn ZB method or OLLCP?

[V Achyuthan]

I am not sure which one would be better, I currently average 6.9 - 7.5 seconds with CFOP, I know full T set, 2/3rd U set, around 15 cases in L set, 4-5 in Pi and 4-5 in H (ZBLL),
and I know around 50 OLLCPs

 

[abunickabhi]

I would prefer ZBLL as it has more ROI and returns if you implement in OH and 2H solves.

 

[V Achyuthan]

I would prefer ZBLL as it has more ROI and returns if you implement in OH and 2H solves.

what do you think about recog, ZB vs OLLCP?, isn't OLLCP easier, if yes, then why do you prefer ZB over OLLCP?

 

[turtwig]

I think ZB is much better because it's 2 look for LSLL whereas OLLCP or normal CFOP is 3 look. I'm tempted to even say that OLLCP is worse than OLL/PLL, as I've never heard of a top 3x3 solver using full OLLCP. I've not looked at all the cases systematically, of course, but my impression is that many cases aren't great. Edge-only PLLs are a better subset on average, but adj cases, which you will get most of the time, are mostly decent - many are better than Z-perm.