mafergut
Legend
Yeah, it's not that I think I'll improve a lot by learning some of those L2E algs but they will not hurt either. Of course I need to work on lookahead if I ever want to get close to 2min as some of you guys.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks Richard. Habit I guess, when I'm thinking/recalling under time pressure, but I'm not aware I'm doing it.nicely done. what's with the little cube shake ticks?
Thanks Grzegorz. I still have to think a bit more between commutators than I do for one-piece-at-a-time methods. That's evident from my 3BLD video from UKC too. And I take more care not to ruin big cube solves at the final stepNice solve Mark. Very fluid and I think the hardest part for you were corners in the end.
Yes I wouldn't usually compare them that way and don't know how legitimate it is. This solve also had faster execution because of no parities.I dont know how this is when comparing 4x4 and 4bld but it might be the same. Knowing it it's hard to compare solving stage of 4bld with solving 4x4 in a speedsolve.
Thanks Ben. Doing it officially is hard though. There are so few chances and it's harder to memo when putting oneself under pressureWow -- I'm not sure I'd realised quite how mind-blowingly good at this you are, Mark! This solve would be around 73rd in the world, if official, and your PB would be 67th!
And I take more care not to ruin big cube solves at the final step. But it's not hard. I'm pretty comfortable with corner comms now.
My first sub-20 5BLD was ruined by twisting a corner the wrong way right at the endThat's the same with me. The bigger cube is the bigger care is.![]()
My first sub-20 5BLD was ruined by twisting a corner the wrong way right at the end![]()
Very nice Ao5, David. You're catching up half a second at a time. Your next PB Ao5 will be beating mineInspired by 6.44 ao100 average by Feliks I'm trying to finally get a sub-20 mo100... probably not going to make it today because I've just got a 44 seconds 10 solves ago, but the rest of the solves are fine. Ao5 PB so far: 16.097 (it was 16.465)
... QiYi WuShuang 5x5: After my first 4x4 I realized I'll likely go stickerless on all my bigger cubes from here on out, so that's the one I got. Feels fantastic to me and makes me wonder why there doesn't seem to be a 4x4 this good right out of the box. ...
Fine with me too.
@pipkiksass: As others have said, 5x5 parity can be intuitively reduced to the single "checkerboard" tredge that can be solved using a variant of 4x4 parity. That's the easiest way. Alternatively, you could use AvG or chain pairing for edge reduction. This matches wings to midges one at a time, which makes for simpler lookahead, and also means that when you do get parity, it's the case where each of the L2E already has one wing/midge pair formed. Thus you need only one parity alg, Rw U2 Rw U2 x U2 Rw U2 3Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw2 (plus occasionally the checkerboard fix). For other edge reduction methods, I suspect you could apply that same alg to solve parity and modify the L2E into a state that can be solved intuitively.
I'm curious about the mechanics of other edge methods. I'm using Yau on 4x4 initially, that was kind of the direction I was instinctively heading myself before discovering it. With the amount of work for 5x5 centers I quickly found it restrictive trying to apply it there and pretty much figured out freeslice on my own. Specifically on 5x5, I've been solving my cross tredges first, and even solve the cross as I'm doing so, figuring it helps me to have the B face devoid of unsolved edges. My Google-fu is failing me for finding info on AvG or chain pairing.
My Google-fu is failing me for finding info on AvG or chain pairing.
I saw probably a 6 and 4 year old girl eating out once with cubes, so I went and talked to them then went and got mine out of the car. The older sister could solve in a couple minutes I think, I was probably around 30 secs at the time?? It was fun.@mark49152, that 4BLD solve is RIDICULOUSLY impressive. Having just learnt 4x4 sighted (just had my first sub-2 single, whoop), I couldn't even begin to imagine what must be going on in your brain to solve it blindfolded. I understand the theory of 3BLD, but still...
In other news, while waiting for my Chinese food last night there was a kid of about 11 with a Gans 3x3 who I reckon was about a 60s solver. He did 4 different OLLs one solve, and quite slowly. I resisted the urge to go over and show off, but almost wish I had!!
Just nice to see another cuber IRL, it's a first for me!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No that sounds like 3-2-3 or 6-6. "Chain pairing" is what someone (experienced) called AvG when I described it to them once, but I haven't heard that terminology often. AvG applies to 5x5 and up and is as described is his video linked above (Arnaud van Galen). I don't do it exactly as he does, but the principle is that rather than solve a whole tredge in one go, you just match up pieces two at a time, wing and centre, until all the tredges are done.@mark49152: On 4x4 I align things so that 3 dedges will pair up with one slice, so is that what's called "chain pairing"? Trying to get the terminology down (just figured out today that "freeslice" is officially what I've been doing on 5x5).
@mark49152 Wow! like everyone else I'm blown away by that 4BLD. I still haven't had a successful 3BLD attempt and I spend longer than 2min just trying to memo. I know blind solving takes a lot of practice, but you possess a natural talent my friend
Regarding 5x5 L2E. My plan has always been to wait until I'm much closer to 2:00 to learn them. I've only learned the one parity case, for everything else I swap/edgeflip. I estimate that learning them all will net me 5 - 10 seconds. So I'll wait until I get down to 2:05 - 2:10 to learn more algs. Might be a while lol...
I still really like my Yuxin Blue 4x4. No spring swap, just a meticulous set up and break in. Though, it's about due for some maintenance as it's slowing down again due to the tensions. In fairness, my cyclone boys G4 is getting a lot more play again lately. I've never lubed or adjusted tensions on the G4, it just needed to be broken in. It seems the Yuxin Blue takes a lot of work to make it great, and keep it that way. Whereas, once broken in, the G4 is basically maintenance free.
It's been 5 months since my last cube order and lots of new puzzles have released. I know I don't need any more, but I'm getting the itch![]()