OH Method Debate

[brododragon]

I use cfop, I’m too lazy to get as good with other methods, and I want to feel good about myself. I dislike (Insert Brody Here) lying to myself, but sometimes, I’ve just gotta do it.

Do you know what objective means? Also, wdym by (Insert Brody Here)?

 

[Micah Morrison]

this video:

 

[brododragon]

?

 

[Micah Morrison]

?

did you watch the video?

 

[Sub1Hour]

how is roux not viable for big cubes M slices are easy

1. Meyer is awful compared to redux and yau
2. No they are not, I have gotten many DNFS because of the MU U perms on 5x5.
3. CFOP and Petrus are much better for big cubes because they have close to no wide moves and are mostly RUF (ZZ is RUL) and thats much better then RrUM. Out of CFOP Petrus Roux and ZZ Roux is by far the worst for big cubes. Petrus and CFOP are viable for big cubes and ZZ to an extent but not roux.

 

[brododragon]

did you watch the video?

A while ago.

 

[brododragon]

this video:

Ohhh I see.

 

[ProStar]

how is roux not viable for big cubes M slices are easy

On 4x4, yeah. On 5x5, doable. 6x6+? You might as well go JPerm and reduce it to a 2x2, it'd be faster than M moves

 

[mukerflap]

On 4x4, yeah. On 5x5, doable. 6x6+? You might as well go JPerm and reduce it to a 2x2, it'd be faster than M moves

skip to end

 

[NevEr_QeyX]

Oh Boy... I'm not ready to read 5 more pages of text yet.

 

[mukerflap]

also note that on this solve, kevin took 16 seconds on 3x3 stage, henry only took 15 with roux

 

[I'm A Cuber]

Do you know what objective means?

Yeah, it means use no evidence and make an argument as opinion based as possible /s

 

[Micah Morrison]

so the fastest Roux 7x7 solve you could find was a 3:33? Also Kevin's solve was back before magnetic 7x7's were a thing and even if his was magnetic it was a flippin' HUANGLONG.

 

[mukerflap]

so the fastest Roux 7x7 solve you could find was a 3:33? Also Kevin's solve was back before magnetic 7x7's were a thing and even if his was magnetic it was a flippin' HUANGLONG.

its because there arent many roux solvers that do 7x7. its just proof that m slices work on big cubes

here is the fastest roux solve on 7x7 (meyer)

 

[Cuberstache]

...It's done by someone who doesn't even use Meyer or Roux as their main method; surely that must say something about their viability.

 

[Nmile7300]

Just saying, this thread is about OH methods. Can we get it back to that instead of big cubes?

 

[mukerflap]

Just saying, this thread is about OH methods. Can we get it back to that instead of big cubes?

it doesnt really matter

 

[NevEr_QeyX]

also note that on this solve, kevin took 16 seconds on 3x3 stage, henry only took 15 with roux

But that was also a long time ago

 

[Nmile7300]

it doesnt really matter

Actually it does. The title of this thread is "OH method debate". We need to keep it on the topic, discussing whether Roux is good for big cubes is completely irrelevant.

 

[brododragon]

Yeah, it means use no evidence and make an argument as opinion based as possible

I hope that's sattire, because that's completely and entirely wrong.

What I really hate is in when debates, as soon as I'm winning, some people will just try to change the subject or just use irony to make arguing useless.