MF8 3x3 (New Structure)

No, but it will be soon. Let's just see how long it takes Verdes to take this cube off the market.
so which is it?
Will it be soon?
Or will we just have to see.

Are you just spreading FUD or do you have any information that others don't have that makes you think that V Cubes will do this?

Let's put it this way: How much money are you willing to bet that it will be taken of the market within a month? None? That is what I thought
 
I think that ball mech. is just an "illusion" we have a new mechanism. It could be very well a normal core. The ball purpose it's just to hold the screws and the center pieces. A GuHong can work very well with a ball core too (smaller).

I don't think the ball mech. will affect in any way the mechanism. For a a 3x3 only the outer pieces matter (corners, edges and centers). I think this cube will behave like a normal, classic one...Type A, C for example.
 
Let's put it this way: How much money are you willing to bet that it will be taken of the market within a month? None? That is what I thought
Everything has changed since the V-Cube topic! Before, most speedsolving users were random people giving random opinions on various cubing topics. But now, nearly everyone is a seasoned expert in international patent law, and every post is now a well-thought-out prediction of future events. (Wait, maybe not.)

Be realistic, Arnaud. The vast majority of people here are random people giving uninformed opinions, and this is implicit in what most people say. There's no need for a Super Moderator to personally call out random users for not being something nobody else expects them to be.
 
I think that ball mech. is just an "illusion" we have a new mechanism. It could be very well a normal core. The ball purpose it's just to hold the screws and the center pieces. A GuHong can work very well with a ball core too (smaller).

Yes and no. The ball is not just a normal core because the springs are inlayed inside. The absence of a spring colum (on a center piece) allows the roots of other pieces to stretch deeper into the center, making a edge pieces having a very long foot and more pop-resistant overall. And yes, it's not the same ball core we know of on the 4x4.
 
Last edited:
Everything has changed since the V-Cube topic! Before, most speedsolving users were random people giving random opinions on various cubing topics. But now, nearly everyone is a seasoned expert in international patent law, and every post is now a well-thought-out prediction of future events. (Wait, maybe not.)

Be realistic, Arnaud. The vast majority of people here are random people giving uninformed opinions, and this is implicit in what most people say. There's no need for a Super Moderator to personally call out random users for not being something nobody else expects them to be.
[introduction]

The V-Cube/Guhong topic was one of the reasons I spent more time here lately compared to the first 8 months of my travelling. Another reason is that I am getting more serious about cubing and practice more and am looking for good algs to replace my sucky ones. And I have a portable internet connection now so I CAN be online almost every day.
Before I started travelling, there were plenty of stupid threads and stupid comments but most of that was by accident. I was quite shocked when I came back and found out that there were sooooo many useless comments like 20 people just saying "no", "that happened to me in my other pants", etc etc etc. There is plenty of high quality new stuff on this forum as well, but the level of pure "posting stupid because it is what everyone does" has increased to unacceptible levels. I never moderated people before, but I have started to do so lately because it is needed.
[/introduction]

Giving an opinion is fine, especially if it is supported by facts and written like an opinion. If I have a different opinion and am (still) interested in the topic I will give my opinion, discuss provided facts and give new information. BUT when someone is spreading complete unsubstantiated information and makes it sound like a fact (No, but it will be soon) instead of an opinion (I think it will be soon) they are actually causing harm and I will correct them. In this case I did it in a VERY correct way (I have been rude lately and have publicly and privately apologised for that).

I have seen a lot of evidence lately that people spread misinformation that is later used by others as a fact (here, on facebook and in general discussions). I consider it as one of my most important tasks as a super moderator to prevent this, especially on a topic that I DO know a lot about. I am not going to correct every person that is wrong on the internet (or even on this forum). I hope that by doing this several times the users that I correct will change their behavior. I also hope that others will see that low quality posts will make you look bad, so they will raise the quality of their posting. So far this is working with 1 exception (that I will not mention by name)
 
Hm and I was about to post a comment asking what the Carl dude did with his charizard but after a post like that how can I? Is it a good bet that witeden and hknowstore will have it first?
 
See it's funny, because he never even tried out the cube and is pretending to be an expert in it.

I am not pretending or anything. As I said before, these stuffs are just empty talks and doesn't prove anything. I never said that it has to be true, but only supports my hypothesis with facts. I pointed out that the ball core on the 4x4 we know of is terrible because of the sliding center and the absence of the springs. The new DaYan 3x3 does not have and sliding center, so that crosses-out the possiblity of having the unforgiving inner layer (because it doesn't have a split inner layer).
As for the springs, well, they did put the springs in the cube, just that it's not the traditional position in the spring colum.
With these two factors eliminated, one should not relate the cube's performance to the current 4x4 mechanisms as it is irrevalent. Honestly, I think this cube is just a normal (original) DaYan 3x3 with a fancy core. The only advanage provided by the ball shape that I could think of is to keep the corner and edge pieces from catching on each other when you cut corners, because the sphere pushes the pieces back out.
 
If you guys read about the trouble Carl went through to get this design to the public, you'd be very excited to own this product.
 
I don't care how much trouble went into the making of it...that doesn't affect quality necessarily. I'm not going to be excited for something solely because someone spent a lot of time on it.
 
I don't care how much trouble went into the making of it...that doesn't affect quality necessarily. I'm not going to be excited for something solely because someone spent a lot of time on it.

Usually, when a person spends a lot of time and effort making something it usually is better quality... however people who are lazy and spend no time making something usually have poor quality.
 
I don't care how much trouble went into the making of it...that doesn't affect quality necessarily. I'm not going to be excited for something solely because someone spent a lot of time on it.

Read please.
 
Back
Top