Blindsighted
Member
Not that I would know but....
UF I think is faster at least that's what fast people say
UF I think is faster at least that's what fast people say
This is completely off topic at this point, but my justification is that the commutators with UB are actually just as good as with UF, and my buffer for corner and my buffer for edge would be right next to each other, allowing for easier setups to 22LL cases if I ever decided to get super super serious about BLD.Not that I would know but....
UF I think is faster at least that's what fast people say
Could you elaborate further on that? I have no idea what you mean.I just found this now and am gonna share something that I did, I bet some people might use something like it, but whatever. When I first started BLD, to memo my first edge cycle I would replace the letters with the "1,2,3 1,2,3 drink." In Sia's song, chandelier. Hope it helped someone.
Well I hope that you know the song "Chandelier." If not, then check it out here,Could you elaborate further on that? I have no idea what you mean.
Well I hope that you know the song "Chandelier." If not, then check it out here,. When it says, "1,2,3 1,2,3 drink, I just sing my first edge cycle to the tune of the song when it says "1,2,3 1,2,3 drink, so I might sing, " X, Q, I, H, U, P, T." and have it in my head.
Yes. It is just working your way around the cube without memoing anything. It helps you identify pieces more quickly.What do you mean? Do you just mean going through all the pieces in my edge cycles? Should I be thinking of the letters, but just not memorizing them?
Yes. You get quicker at choosing words and you learn more about your weak points such as sounds you may confuse.Does full audio on edges improve much with practice?
If so, I might put more time into it
What about just sounding out letters? Do people find it easier choosing words?Yes. You get quicker at choosing words and you learn more about your weak points such as sounds you may confuse.
I assume that you are still talking about pairs. Issues you can have are words sounding similar. For me KT is KaT. It would be easy to recall that as CaT if I didn't have a system that I know (CT is ChaT).What about just sounding out letters? Do people find it easier choosing words?
No, I meant sounding out the individual letters, and I'm curious: why does it double the amount I have to recall? If you just say like "plskatinb" it can sometimes be very fastI assume that you are still talking about pairs. Issues you can have are words sounding similar. For me KT is KaT. It would be easy to recall that as CaT if I didn't have a system that I know (CT is ChaT).
If you mean sounding out the individual letters then you are doubling the amount you have to recall and it's harder to keep track of parity. Not recommended.
Sounding out individual letters is twice the amount of syllables to recall. It's definitely slower and makes things harder.No, I meant sounding out the individual letters, and I'm curious: why does it double the amount I have to recall? If you just say like "plskatinb" it can sometimes be very fast
Whoops, 'individual' may have been the wrong word for me to use.Sounding out individual letters is twice the amount of syllables to recall. It's definitely slower and makes things harder.
plskatinb = Pee Ell Ess Kay Ay Tee Eye En Bee
plskatinb = Pill Seek At In B
The 2nd one is much faster to encode and recall. But you also shouldn't stick completely to real words. Like you can just pronounce OB and VU how they're spelled.
Oh okay, I thought you might have meant that. That's basically what I/most people do. It's just that you've lumped more letters together.Whoops, 'individual' may have been the wrong word for me to use.
I was meaning sounding out each letter like in a word.
plskatinb is spelled literally the same as how it's pronounced in what I'm talking about. maybe: "Pl-uh-sk-at-inb" (not seperated for syllables).
Really, I thought this was how everyone did it and that's what everyone meant when they said audio edges (although I knew audio edges can be done in many different ways).
I average 1:30-1:40 but I'll try out the words and sounds combination
That's audio but not strictly pairs. If it works for you then stick with it. Pairs should cut down on mistakes and help track parity though.Whoops, 'individual' may have been the wrong word for me to use.
I was meaning sounding out each letter like in a word.
plskatinb is spelled literally the same as how it's pronounced in what I'm talking about. maybe: "Pl-uh-sk-at-inb" (not seperated for syllables).
Really, I thought this was how everyone did it and that's what everyone meant when they said audio edges (although I knew audio edges can be done in many different ways).
I average 1:30-1:40 but I'll try out the words and sounds combination
Well I hope that you know the song "Chandelier." If not, then check it out here,. When it says, "1,2,3 1,2,3 drink, I just sing my first edge cycle to the tune of the song when it says "1,2,3 1,2,3 drink, so I might sing, " X, Q, I, H, U, P, T." and have it in my head.
Lol I forgot all about that dumb method. Might try it again soon though.Rhythm(Beats) is a very good concept.
It is just non-linear metronome, which can come handy, since we are memorising things that are distinct.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
MBLD vs hour cards memory event | Blindsolving Discussion | 4 | ||
Memory | General Speedcubing Discussion | 5 | ||
Summary and Explanation of Memory Methods | Blindsolving Discussion | 26 | ||
Pochmann Memory Methods | Blindsolving Discussion | 37 | ||
different memory methods advantages and disadvantages | Blindsolving Discussion | 43 |