_zoux
Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2018
- Messages
- 101
Mostly all points here are honestly dumb anf fits category "I don't do zz, so let me call it bad".
When i was reading this thread first time, it was killing me inside, so let me break some points:
-L2/R2s are bad.
If so, then roux look at awkward roux transition beetwen CMLL and LSE.
If your CFOP is rotationless, or just less rotations, then look at your giant regrips with B/R/F/L moves.
If something doesn't fit your turn style, it doesn't mean that it's bad.
EOLine worse than cross/EOline less finger-friendly/EOline is hard to inspecc.
Why comparing steps, where one forces on 4 pieces, and other on 12.
It's not less finger friendly, same as cross.
I can do Xeoline in most of my solves.
You can't be sure that any method is a bad method if you're not at
least sub 30 with it.
ZZ is objectivly better than cfop, and on par with roux.
When i was reading this thread first time, it was killing me inside, so let me break some points:
-L2/R2s are bad.
If so, then roux look at awkward roux transition beetwen CMLL and LSE.
If your CFOP is rotationless, or just less rotations, then look at your giant regrips with B/R/F/L moves.
If something doesn't fit your turn style, it doesn't mean that it's bad.
EOLine worse than cross/EOline less finger-friendly/EOline is hard to inspecc.
Why comparing steps, where one forces on 4 pieces, and other on 12.
It's not less finger friendly, same as cross.
I can do Xeoline in most of my solves.
You can't be sure that any method is a bad method if you're not at
least sub 30 with it.
ZZ is objectivly better than cfop, and on par with roux.