ExultantCarn
Regular
What if instead of just solving your last pair, you use phasing when solving it? I haven't worked out how many algs that would be, but that should greatly reduce the alg count while only adding 3-4 extra moves
Is 1LLL possible?
- Thread starter Aurichalcite
- Start date
Doing LS differently to reduce the number of LL cases is not what this thread is about. Yes, phasing would reduce alg count (by a factor of 3), but it's not even as large a reduction as EO (factor of 8) and people don't consider these subsets to be "full 1LLL".
1001010101001
Veteran
What about 1LHC (1 look whole cube)
One Wheel
Legend
That's called blindsolving.
Duncan Bannon
Veteran
Its could be called Speed blind.
1001010101001
Veteran
I mean 1 alg whole cube.
U
Underwatercuber
Guest
No that isn’t humanly possible without somehow extending your life. I did some pretty rough math and assuming you learned 100 algs per day it would take 1.177 x 10^15 YEARS. Let’s not even talk about recognition.
1001010101001
Veteran
Recognition is done on inspection.
U
Underwatercuber
Guest
Obviously. The part that makes it impossible is the fact that you have to recall what each of your 43 quintillion algs are for which of those 43 quintillion cases your see during inspection.
1001010101001
Veteran
But if you can you are sure to set a world record.I'll leave it here 
cuber314159
Legend
Is 1 look 2x2 theoretically possible though?
A 2x2 has 3674160 combinations
So if we assume it's inventor started learning 200 algs a day in 1970 then hed be finishing soon
But then again why would anyone do that?
A 2x2 has 3674160 combinations
So if we assume it's inventor started learning 200 algs a day in 1970 then hed be finishing soon
But then again why would anyone do that?
Thom S.
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,276
Well, there are only 120 States that can be solved in four Moves and 534 in five so that's deffenitely possible
Ask Frank Morris, he probably does that already
Last edited by a moderator:
cuber314159
Legend
I think we should bring back some of Lucas Garrons' stuff, it was funny and can easily be done here, just not sure whether people will cooperate, especially when most people who regularly use off topic are newer cubers who wouldn't know about it.
Last edited:
U
Underwatercuber
Guest
Also that should be 1LWC
shadowslice e
Legend
I believe the accepted term is F3L.Also that should be 1LWC
If you allow for 1 set up move (R, R', R2, F', F, F2, L, L', L2, U, U', U2, D, D', D2, B', B, B2) then you can use a large amount of symmetry to reduce cases. Furthermore I am not certain if the number of combinations (3674160) includes cases which are symmetric to a rotation and solved by the same algorithm. If not, the allowing (A) one rotation, and (B) one setup move, could reduce the number of cases by a factor of 80 (45,927 cases). Correct my math if I'm wrong.
Sue Doenim
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2016
- Messages
- 448
I don't know how right that math is, but 3.6 million is with a fixed corner. Also, you could ignore all of the positions taking 5 moves or less to knock off 9992 algs.
Cubed Cuber
Veteran
ZBLL?
Zeroing?
Zeroing?
Thom S.
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,276
ZBLL stands for Zborowski-Bruchem Last Layer and is the subset of 1LLL in which all of the Edges are Oriented. There are 593 Cases and multiple people have learnt it.
Zeroing is basically the best Method that exists and people say, we have to stop telling new cubers it's a thing, because it doesn't exist and is just made up.
Cubed Cuber
Veteran
I saw a couple youtube videos of people that finish the LL while inserting the last pair for F2L. I'm guessing that their fake.
Similar threads
