Christopher Cabrera
Regular
I perfectly understand what you mean. Especially 2) showed my logic was far from perfection. Yet, I still insist on 2 things: 1. Time should be counted as a factor of scoring. 2. With current rules, penalties with unsolved cubes are a little too harsh.
From that, I've tweaked my formula a little bit:
((Number of solved cubes)-(Number of unsolved cubes)*x)/(Time (in hour))^y
Both x and y are constants that I'm unsure about their appropriate value, but I think x should be around 0.5~0.8 (to soften the penalty) and y be around 0.1~0.3 (to apply weaker 'speed bonus'). This should make the formula more moderate.
And to be honest, I'm a total MBLD noob - my PB is only 2/2 in 9:39. I've started to think if posting my idea was a mistake at the first place since I do not know very well about the event...
Time should not be a heavy factor in scoring because like I said before multi blind is different from all the other events. The goal of a multi blind is not to find out "Who's the fastest," It is to figure out who has the abiltity to memorize and exectute more cubes in under an hour. It's a bit like the reason we do not include time factors for FMC. Furthermore, by this metric someone who has the ability to memorize and execute 11 cubes is more "skilled" than someone who has the ablity to memorize and exectute 10 cubes, regardless of time. If you are at the point where you solve 10/10 in 30:00 and you are upset because some one else beat you by doing 11/11 in 60:00, the problem is not with the scoring system. The problem is that you are not pushing yourself hard enough
