• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Help Thread] Multi-Blind Discussion

I perfectly understand what you mean. Especially 2) showed my logic was far from perfection. Yet, I still insist on 2 things: 1. Time should be counted as a factor of scoring. 2. With current rules, penalties with unsolved cubes are a little too harsh.
From that, I've tweaked my formula a little bit:

((Number of solved cubes)-(Number of unsolved cubes)*x)/(Time (in hour))^y

Both x and y are constants that I'm unsure about their appropriate value, but I think x should be around 0.5~0.8 (to soften the penalty) and y be around 0.1~0.3 (to apply weaker 'speed bonus'). This should make the formula more moderate.

And to be honest, I'm a total MBLD noob - my PB is only 2/2 in 9:39. I've started to think if posting my idea was a mistake at the first place since I do not know very well about the event...

Time should not be a heavy factor in scoring because like I said before multi blind is different from all the other events. The goal of a multi blind is not to find out "Who's the fastest," It is to figure out who has the abiltity to memorize and exectute more cubes in under an hour. It's a bit like the reason we do not include time factors for FMC. Furthermore, by this metric someone who has the ability to memorize and execute 11 cubes is more "skilled" than someone who has the ablity to memorize and exectute 10 cubes, regardless of time. If you are at the point where you solve 10/10 in 30:00 and you are upset because some one else beat you by doing 11/11 in 60:00, the problem is not with the scoring system. The problem is that you are not pushing yourself hard enough
 
While I like the idea at a first glance, it's important to keep in mind that MBLD is,differently from 3BLD, not about solving one cube really fast, but about solving (as) many cubes (as you can) consistently.
 
2) Points are determined by (number of solved cubes)-(number of unsolved cubes), not number of solved cubes only
I know this could be kind of controversial, but to me being penaltied by unfinished cubes seems to be unfair. For example, why should 5/10 attempt counted as 0 point and then DNFed when the competitor succesfully solved 5 cubes? He/She did complete exactly same amount of cubes with the one who did 5/5, but the result is nothing but DNF only because of the rest of the cubes, remaining unsolved. That's kinda nonsensical, I should say.
There's a very big difference between someone who can do 5/5 cubes with perfect accuracy vs someone who gets 10 scrambles but just solves the 5 easiest ones. Accuracy has to pay a role in how the scoring works to distinguish between these situations.
 
I have just got an idea about "ranks" for MBLD

Cubes sub-hour/rank
1-9 = rookie
10-19 = intermediate
20-29 = PRO (Over 20 people in the world)
30-39 = GOD (About 5 people)
40+ = Maskow (1 person)

As for me, I am between intermediate and pro(my pb is 19/20 in 56:xx).
 
Last edited:
I have just got an idea about "ranks" for MBLD

Cubes sub-hour/rank
1-9 = rookie
10-19 = intermediate
20-29 = PRO (Over 20 people in the world)
30-39 = GOD (About 5 people)
40+ = Maskow (1 person)

As for me, I am between intermediate and pro(my pb is 19/20 in 56:xx).
Is this a metric used to measure a person's ability in the event or is it just based on official results?
 
Yes, a metric used to measure ability in event. This is how I divide MBLDers. What do you mean by "based on official results"?
I'm pretty sure there are other multi BLDers who are capable of 40+ results Maskow is just the only one who has done it at competition.

Also my idea of ranking would look more like this:
1-5 = Rookie (People who just started the event)
6-12 = Intermediate (People who actually practice this event)
13-20 = Aficionado (People who likely main BLD events)
20-30 = Pro (People who will likely win/podium at most competitions)
30+ = World Class (People who would likely win/podium at worlds or continental championships)
 
What about with any time?
I just keep seeing those numbers
I can't remember tbh

And looking through attempts that I have done about a month is very tedious

Edit:
Other 23/25 in chronological order backwards:
23/25 MBLD in 1hr 30.07s
23/25 in 1:04
23/25 MBLD in 1hr 6min 27.90s
23/25 MBLD in 1hr 20min 57.20s
 
Last edited:
Back
Top