Fridrich Method and LBL
- Thread starter baka67
- Start date
IamWEB
Legend
...
Fridrich is further advanced, widely used by pros, requires a lot more algorithms, and is far better than LBL, but it depends on which 'LBL' you're doing.
Fridrich is further advanced, widely used by pros, requires a lot more algorithms, and is far better than LBL, but it depends on which 'LBL' you're doing.
IamWEB
Legend
I do where you can learn it: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=0B7E0E5922B76D76
But 87.6949532% of the time, it's: http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/search.php?do=process
But 87.6949532% of the time, it's: http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/search.php?do=process
abr71310
Veteran
You use LBL from Dan's cube station and got 35.63?!??!
O_O wow, I guess I really do suck at cubing -- my PB for Fridrich is 26.42 (sig), but I can only get times of 50+ using LBL (I use variety of LBL methods -- all of which get me 50+... Keyhole, the little booklet that comes with a storebought, Cube Station, EVEN YOUTUBE!!!).
What's your TPS, and hows your recognition for LL? (even F2L >_>)??
O_O wow, I guess I really do suck at cubing -- my PB for Fridrich is 26.42 (sig), but I can only get times of 50+ using LBL (I use variety of LBL methods -- all of which get me 50+... Keyhole, the little booklet that comes with a storebought, Cube Station, EVEN YOUTUBE!!!).
What's your TPS, and hows your recognition for LL? (even F2L >_>)??
N
nitrocan
Guest
Umm didn't baka mean ------ in Japanese?
Or is your name not related to that?
Well Fridrich is much better than LBL because LBL is just the simplified version of Fridrich. Fridrich is kind of a LBL approach too but you do the first two layers in 4 corner-edge pair insertions instead of doing 4 corner and then 4 edge insertions.
Or is your name not related to that?
Well Fridrich is much better than LBL because LBL is just the simplified version of Fridrich. Fridrich is kind of a LBL approach too but you do the first two layers in 4 corner-edge pair insertions instead of doing 4 corner and then 4 edge insertions.
h5n1
Regular
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 33
I have been using the LBL method for a little while and tried to learn the Petrus method, but could never solve the f2l faster than 3min. However with the Friedrich method I can now do it in about 1 min with help from the advice in this guide:
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=_3zmU8O7CKw
My times are still not very fast with an average of around 2 minutes. I solve the last layer with 12 algs mostly from the Petrus guide.
Seems I'm stuck on 2+ minutes. Still having fun turning chaos into order ^_^
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=_3zmU8O7CKw
My times are still not very fast with an average of around 2 minutes. I solve the last layer with 12 algs mostly from the Petrus guide.
Seems I'm stuck on 2+ minutes. Still having fun turning chaos into order ^_^
bichettereds
Regular
Fridrich is much faster. They both start with the cross but Fridrich inserts the first 2 layers' corners and edges at the same time and if you learn all the OLLs and PLLs, solving the last layer is much much faster.
You can start learning just the 2-Look OLLs first so you dont get overwhelmed. You dont really need to learn any algorithms for F2L, just do it intuitively by watching a tutorial or something.
When I first started using Fridrich F2L it actually slowed my time down alittle. That step is probably the most important step in your solve. Remembering algorithms is the easy part.
puzzlemaster
Veteran
U more than likely would want to learn intuitive F2L at first and then 2Look OLL in addition to 2 PLL's. The U-Perm and the A-Perm... using that type of method to solve you should be able to get around a minute easily.. with some practice I think that can be worked down to around 40 seconds.. after that you want to learn algorithms for the F2L, the OLL, and PLL
Similar threads
