Glomnipotent
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2018
- Messages
- 10
Just happened at Koalafication Brisbane 2019.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which oneI've been waiting to see an average like this for some time. I will remember of it just as I remember his 6.65 WR.
Oh, I didn't know that there were two! But I suppose it was the first. This one.Which one? There are two of them.
I wasn't cubing when that happened, was there something particularly special about it?
I've removed all the unrelated posts and warned the user. Someone asked how they can improve in this thread so we've removed related posts. As far as I know there wasn't a thread merged into it.wow mods got so overwhelmed with feliks WR that merged the wrong topic
Well in the description of Tingman's video of solve 2 Feliks said that he didn't know the zbll and so did the regular oll. He must have recognised that he was going to get a T-Perm and then cancelled into it.Reconstructions by Stewy:
The ZBLL on solve 2 is interesting (OLL cancelled into T perm). I think the common alg is the move-optimal one starting with either R U' R' U (headlights back) or R' U R U' (headlights front).
That's what it said when I posted it; I just assumed Feliks knew for this ZBLL case that doing OLL at that angle would lead into a T perm while cancelling three moves, as opposed to doing OLL first and looking ahead into what PLL case he'd get.Edit: It looks like the reconstruction that you posted has changed to say "most of oll" and "cancel into pll" instead of "zbll"
You're right, sorry, I misunderstood your postThat's what it said when I posted it; I just assumed Feliks knew for this ZBLL case that doing OLL at that angle would lead into a T perm while cancelling three moves, as opposed to doing OLL first and looking ahead into what PLL case he'd get.